Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (41-50 of 59) with videos related to
Page
of 6
Sort By:
Journal of Vision
|
January 11, 2007
Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold
Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson, Daniel H Baker
I-Perception
|
June 27, 2013
Paradoxical psychometric functions ("swan functions") are explained by dilution masking in four stimulus dimensions
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson
Vision Research
|
June 13, 2008
Contrast masking in strabismic amblyopia: attenuation, noise, interocular suppression and binocular summation
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Robert F Hess
Spatial Vision
|
August 25, 2007
Binocular interaction: contrast matching and contrast discrimination are predicted by the same model
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson
Journal of Vision
|
January 16, 2015
Area summation of first- and second-order modulations of luminance
Robert J Summers, Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese
Visual Neuroscience
|
September 4, 2008
A common contrast pooling rule for suppression within and between the eyes
Tim S Meese, Kirsten L Challinor, Robert J Summers
Journal of Vision
|
January 31, 2006
Size matters, but not for everyone: individual differences for contrast discrimination
Tim S Meese, Robert F Hess, Cristyn B Williams
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|
October 27, 2007
Binocular summation of contrast remains intact in strabismic amblyopia
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Behzad Mansouri, et al.
Perception
|
December 9, 2025
Introducing Philosophy Corner
Tim S Meese, Pascal Mamassian, Isabelle Mareschal, et al.
Plos One
|
April 10, 2012
The effect of interocular phase difference on perceived contrast
Daniel H Baker, Stuart A Wallis, Mark A Georgeson, et al.
Page
of 6
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (41-50 of 59) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 6
Journal of Vision
|
January 11, 2007
Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold
Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson, Daniel H Baker
I-Perception
|
June 27, 2013
Paradoxical psychometric functions ("swan functions") are explained by dilution masking in four stimulus dimensions
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson
Vision Research
|
June 13, 2008
Contrast masking in strabismic amblyopia: attenuation, noise, interocular suppression and binocular summation
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Robert F Hess
Spatial Vision
|
August 25, 2007
Binocular interaction: contrast matching and contrast discrimination are predicted by the same model
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson
Journal of Vision
|
January 16, 2015
Area summation of first- and second-order modulations of luminance
Robert J Summers, Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese
Visual Neuroscience
|
September 4, 2008
A common contrast pooling rule for suppression within and between the eyes
Tim S Meese, Kirsten L Challinor, Robert J Summers
Journal of Vision
|
January 31, 2006
Size matters, but not for everyone: individual differences for contrast discrimination
Tim S Meese, Robert F Hess, Cristyn B Williams
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|
October 27, 2007
Binocular summation of contrast remains intact in strabismic amblyopia
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Behzad Mansouri, et al.
Perception
|
December 9, 2025
Introducing Philosophy Corner
Tim S Meese, Pascal Mamassian, Isabelle Mareschal, et al.
Plos One
|
April 10, 2012
The effect of interocular phase difference on perceived contrast
Daniel H Baker, Stuart A Wallis, Mark A Georgeson, et al.
Page
of 6