Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (11-20 of 18) with videos related to
Page
of 2
Sort By:
You have reached the last page of results.
This site can display upto 18 results.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
|
July 28, 2016
Transparency in Ecology and Evolution: Real Problems, Real Solutions
Timothy H Parker, Wolfgang Forstmeier, Julia Koricheva, et al.
BMC Biology
|
April 4, 2023
Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology
Yefeng Yang, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Rose E O'Dea, et al.
Nature Ecology & Evolution
|
May 24, 2018
Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency
Timothy H Parker, Simon C Griffith, Judith L Bronstein, et al.
Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
|
May 7, 2021
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension
Rose E O'Dea, Malgorzata Lagisz, Michael D Jennions, et al.
BMC Biology
|
April 10, 2021
Towards open, reliable, and transparent ecology and evolutionary biology
Rose E O'Dea, Timothy H Parker, Yung En Chee, et al.
Plos One
|
January 26, 2023
Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with the repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science) process
Hannah Fraser, Martin Bush, Bonnie C Wintle, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour
|
April 14, 2019
Redefine statistical significance
Daniel J Benjamin, James O Berger, Magnus Johannesson, et al.
BMC Biology
|
February 6, 2025
Same data, different analysts: variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology
Elliot Gould, Hannah S Fraser, Timothy H Parker, et al.
Page
of 2
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (11-20 of 18) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 2
You have reached the last page of results.
This site can display upto 18 results.
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
|
July 28, 2016
Transparency in Ecology and Evolution: Real Problems, Real Solutions
Timothy H Parker, Wolfgang Forstmeier, Julia Koricheva, et al.
BMC Biology
|
April 4, 2023
Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology
Yefeng Yang, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Rose E O'Dea, et al.
Nature Ecology & Evolution
|
May 24, 2018
Empowering peer reviewers with a checklist to improve transparency
Timothy H Parker, Simon C Griffith, Judith L Bronstein, et al.
Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
|
May 7, 2021
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension
Rose E O'Dea, Malgorzata Lagisz, Michael D Jennions, et al.
BMC Biology
|
April 10, 2021
Towards open, reliable, and transparent ecology and evolutionary biology
Rose E O'Dea, Timothy H Parker, Yung En Chee, et al.
Plos One
|
January 26, 2023
Predicting reliability through structured expert elicitation with the repliCATS (Collaborative Assessments for Trustworthy Science) process
Hannah Fraser, Martin Bush, Bonnie C Wintle, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour
|
April 14, 2019
Redefine statistical significance
Daniel J Benjamin, James O Berger, Magnus Johannesson, et al.
BMC Biology
|
February 6, 2025
Same data, different analysts: variation in effect sizes due to analytical decisions in ecology and evolutionary biology
Elliot Gould, Hannah S Fraser, Timothy H Parker, et al.
Page
of 2