Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (11-20 of 30) with videos related to
Page
of 3
Sort By:
BMC Medical Research Methodology
|
September 21, 2021
Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence
Timothy Hugh Barker, Celina Borges Migliavaca, Cinara Stein, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis
|
December 8, 2022
Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews
Zachary Munn, Jennifer C Stone, Edoardo Aromataris, et al.
Research Synthesis Methods
|
January 28, 2022
Meta-analysis of prevalence: I<sup>2</sup> statistic and how to deal with heterogeneity
Celina Borges Migliavaca, Cinara Stein, Verônica Colpani, et al.
The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
|
December 19, 2024
The impact of using cannabis during pregnancy on the infant and mother: An overview of systematic reviews, evidence map, targeted updates, and de novo synthesis
Zachary Munn, Danielle Pollock, Jennifer Stone, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis
|
October 10, 2020
Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool
Zachary Munn, Timothy Hugh Barker, Sandeep Moola, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis
|
February 2, 2023
The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials
Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer C Stone, Kim Sears, et al.
Disability and Rehabilitation
|
March 19, 2026
Identifying priorities for a national motor neurone disease (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) guideline: results from an Australian online survey
Anna Fragkoudi, Cindy Stern, Danielle Pollock, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis
|
September 19, 2022
Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process
Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer C Stone, Kim Sears, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis
|
March 8, 2023
From critical appraisal to risk of bias assessment: clarifying the terminology for study evaluation in JBI systematic reviews
Jennifer C Stone, Timothy Hugh Barker, Edoardo Aromataris, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|
November 1, 2020
Guidelines rarely used GRADE and applied methods inconsistently: A methodological study of Australian guidelines
Timothy Hugh Barker, Mafalda Dias, Cindy Stern, et al.
Page
of 3
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (11-20 of 30) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 3
BMC Medical Research Methodology
|
September 21, 2021
Conducting proportional meta-analysis in different types of systematic reviews: a guide for synthesisers of evidence
Timothy Hugh Barker, Celina Borges Migliavaca, Cinara Stein, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis
|
December 8, 2022
Assessing the risk of bias of quantitative analytical studies: introducing the vision for critical appraisal within JBI systematic reviews
Zachary Munn, Jennifer C Stone, Edoardo Aromataris, et al.
Research Synthesis Methods
|
January 28, 2022
Meta-analysis of prevalence: I<sup>2</sup> statistic and how to deal with heterogeneity
Celina Borges Migliavaca, Cinara Stein, Verônica Colpani, et al.
The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
|
December 19, 2024
The impact of using cannabis during pregnancy on the infant and mother: An overview of systematic reviews, evidence map, targeted updates, and de novo synthesis
Zachary Munn, Danielle Pollock, Jennifer Stone, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis
|
October 10, 2020
Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool
Zachary Munn, Timothy Hugh Barker, Sandeep Moola, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis
|
February 2, 2023
The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for randomized controlled trials
Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer C Stone, Kim Sears, et al.
Disability and Rehabilitation
|
March 19, 2026
Identifying priorities for a national motor neurone disease (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) guideline: results from an Australian online survey
Anna Fragkoudi, Cindy Stern, Danielle Pollock, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis
|
September 19, 2022
Revising the JBI quantitative critical appraisal tools to improve their applicability: an overview of methods and the development process
Timothy Hugh Barker, Jennifer C Stone, Kim Sears, et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis
|
March 8, 2023
From critical appraisal to risk of bias assessment: clarifying the terminology for study evaluation in JBI systematic reviews
Jennifer C Stone, Timothy Hugh Barker, Edoardo Aromataris, et al.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
|
November 1, 2020
Guidelines rarely used GRADE and applied methods inconsistently: A methodological study of Australian guidelines
Timothy Hugh Barker, Mafalda Dias, Cindy Stern, et al.
Page
of 3