Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Tom M Palmer

Showing results (1-10 of 42) with videos related to

Pageof 5
Sort By:
Statistics in Medicine|September 4, 2008
Meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies incorporating all three genotypesTom M Palmer, John R Thompson, Martin D Tobin
Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)|January 20, 2021
To Adjust or Not to Adjust? When a "Confounder" Is Only Measured After ExposureRolf H H Groenwold, Tom M Palmer, Kate Tilling
American Journal of Epidemiology|November 7, 2017
Correcting the Standard Errors of 2-Stage Residual Inclusion Estimators for Mendelian Randomization StudiesTom M Palmer, Michael V Holmes, Brendan J Keating, et al.
Social Science & Medicine (1982)|December 19, 2020
The role of combinatorial health technologies in supporting older people with long-term conditions: Responsibilisation or co-management of healthcare?Sandra Varey, Mandy Dixon, Alejandra Hernández, et al.
American Journal of Epidemiology|May 27, 2014
Lack of identification in semiparametric instrumental variable models with binary outcomesStephen Burgess, Raquel Granell, Tom M Palmer, et al.
American Journal of Epidemiology|August 2, 2012
Re: "credible mendelian randomization studies: approaches for evaluating the instrumental variable assumptions"Tom M Palmer, Roland R Ramsahai, Debbie A Lawlor, et al.
International Journal of Epidemiology|May 9, 2008
Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responsesTom M Palmer, John R Thompson, Martin D Tobin, et al.
BMJ Open|March 2, 2018
How effective and cost-effective are innovative combinatorial technologies and practices for supporting older people with long-term conditions to remain well in the community? An evaluation protocol for an NHS Test Bed in North West EnglandSandra Varey, Alejandra Hernández, Tom M Palmer, et al.
Statistics in Medicine|October 20, 2012
Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studiesRoger M Harbord, Vanessa Didelez, Tom M Palmer, et al.
Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology|December 15, 2017
Reading comprehension difficulties in children with rolandic epilepsyNicola K Currie, Adina R Lew, Tom M Palmer, et al.
Pageof 5

Showing results (1-10 of 42) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 5
Statistics in Medicine|September 4, 2008
Meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies incorporating all three genotypesTom M Palmer, John R Thompson, Martin D Tobin
Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)|January 20, 2021
To Adjust or Not to Adjust? When a "Confounder" Is Only Measured After ExposureRolf H H Groenwold, Tom M Palmer, Kate Tilling
American Journal of Epidemiology|November 7, 2017
Correcting the Standard Errors of 2-Stage Residual Inclusion Estimators for Mendelian Randomization StudiesTom M Palmer, Michael V Holmes, Brendan J Keating, et al.
Social Science & Medicine (1982)|December 19, 2020
The role of combinatorial health technologies in supporting older people with long-term conditions: Responsibilisation or co-management of healthcare?Sandra Varey, Mandy Dixon, Alejandra Hernández, et al.
American Journal of Epidemiology|May 27, 2014
Lack of identification in semiparametric instrumental variable models with binary outcomesStephen Burgess, Raquel Granell, Tom M Palmer, et al.
American Journal of Epidemiology|August 2, 2012
Re: "credible mendelian randomization studies: approaches for evaluating the instrumental variable assumptions"Tom M Palmer, Roland R Ramsahai, Debbie A Lawlor, et al.
International Journal of Epidemiology|May 9, 2008
Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responsesTom M Palmer, John R Thompson, Martin D Tobin, et al.
BMJ Open|March 2, 2018
How effective and cost-effective are innovative combinatorial technologies and practices for supporting older people with long-term conditions to remain well in the community? An evaluation protocol for an NHS Test Bed in North West EnglandSandra Varey, Alejandra Hernández, Tom M Palmer, et al.
Statistics in Medicine|October 20, 2012
Severity of bias of a simple estimator of the causal odds ratio in Mendelian randomization studiesRoger M Harbord, Vanessa Didelez, Tom M Palmer, et al.
Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology|December 15, 2017
Reading comprehension difficulties in children with rolandic epilepsyNicola K Currie, Adina R Lew, Tom M Palmer, et al.
Pageof 5