Showing results (201-210 of 989) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 99
European Urology|March 4, 2008
Radical prostatectomy for incidental (stage T1a-T1b) prostate cancer: analysis of predictors for residual disease and biochemical recurrenceUmberto Capitanio, Vincenzo Scattoni, Massimo Freschi, et al.
The Journal of Urology|August 19, 2017
Which Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Can be Safely Treated with Flexible Ureteroscopy with Holmium:YAG Laser Photoablation? Long-Term Results from a High Volume InstitutionLuca Villa, Mattieu Haddad, Umberto Capitanio, et al.
AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology|May 1, 2019
The Evolution of MRI of the Prostate: The Past, the Present, and the FutureFrancesco Giganti, Andrew B Rosenkrantz, Geert Villeirs, et al.
The Journal of Urology|July 24, 2012
Identifying candidates for active surveillance: an evaluation of the repeat biopsy strategy for men with favorable risk prostate cancerWinston E Barzell, Myron R Melamed, Paul Cathcart, et al.
BJU International|July 4, 2013
Image-directed, tissue-preserving focal therapy of prostate cancer: a feasibility study of a novel deformable magnetic resonance-ultrasound (MR-US) registration systemLouise Dickinson, Yipeng Hu, Hashim U Ahmed, et al.
European Urology Focus|September 28, 2021
Detailing Sexual Outcomes After Focal Therapy for Localised Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisGaelle Fiard, Aminah Chowdhury, Aneirin R Potter, et al.
Acta Biomaterialia|July 15, 2020
Human airway-like multilayered tissue on 3D-TIPS printed thermoresponsive elastomer/collagen hybrid scaffoldsLinxiao Wu, Adrián Magaz, Suguo Huo, et al.
Medical Physics|February 19, 2026
On the degrees of freedom of gridded control points in learning-based medical image registrationWen Yan, Qianye Yang, Yipei Wang, et al.
Current Opinion in Urology|September 16, 2015
A review of economic evaluations of diagnostic strategies using imaging in men at risk of prostate cancerSarah R Willis, Jan van der Meulen, Massimo Valerio, et al.
The Journal of Urology|November 13, 2004
A systematic review and critique of the literature relating hospital or surgeon volume to health outcomes for 3 urological cancer proceduresMartin Nuttall, Jan van der Meulen, Nirree Phillips, et al.
Pageof 99