Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

V Lipp

Showing results (11-20 of 219) with videos related to

Pageof 22
Sort By:
Emotion (Washington, D.C.)|June 6, 2024
The face pareidolia illusion drives a happy face advantage that is dependent on perceived genderOttmar V Lipp, Jessica Taubert
Emotion (Washington, D.C.)|September 29, 2005
Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe taskOttmar V Lipp, Nazanin Derakshan
Psychophysiology|May 30, 2007
Does emotion modulate the blink reflex in human conditioning? Startle potentiation during pleasant and unpleasant cues in the picture-picture paradigmKimberley M Mallan, Ottmar V Lipp
Emotion (Washington, D.C.)|May 23, 2007
Automatic attention does not equal automatic fear: preferential attention without implicit valenceHelena M Purkis, Ottmar V Lipp
Cognition & Emotion|June 13, 2012
No support for dual process accounts of human affective learning in simple Pavlovian conditioningOttmar V Lipp, Helena M Purkis
British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)|March 15, 2018
The relationship between visual search and categorization of own- and other-age facesBelinda M Craig, Ottmar V Lipp
Emotion (Washington, D.C.)|July 6, 2016
The influence of facial sex cues on emotional expression categorization is not fixedBelinda M Craig, Ottmar V Lipp
Biological Psychology|March 20, 1998
The effect of repeated prepulse and reflex stimulus presentations on startle prepulse inhibitionO V Lipp, S P Krinitzky
Cognition & Emotion|March 11, 2020
Measuring unconditional stimulus expectancy during evaluative conditioning strengthens explicit conditional stimulus valenceCamilla C Luck, Ottmar V Lipp
Cognition & Emotion|February 1, 2017
Verbal instructions targeting valence alter negative conditional stimulus evaluations (but do not affect reinstatement rates)Camilla C Luck, Ottmar V Lipp
Pageof 22

Showing results (11-20 of 219) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 22
Emotion (Washington, D.C.)|June 6, 2024
The face pareidolia illusion drives a happy face advantage that is dependent on perceived genderOttmar V Lipp, Jessica Taubert
Emotion (Washington, D.C.)|September 29, 2005
Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe taskOttmar V Lipp, Nazanin Derakshan
Psychophysiology|May 30, 2007
Does emotion modulate the blink reflex in human conditioning? Startle potentiation during pleasant and unpleasant cues in the picture-picture paradigmKimberley M Mallan, Ottmar V Lipp
Emotion (Washington, D.C.)|May 23, 2007
Automatic attention does not equal automatic fear: preferential attention without implicit valenceHelena M Purkis, Ottmar V Lipp
Cognition & Emotion|June 13, 2012
No support for dual process accounts of human affective learning in simple Pavlovian conditioningOttmar V Lipp, Helena M Purkis
British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)|March 15, 2018
The relationship between visual search and categorization of own- and other-age facesBelinda M Craig, Ottmar V Lipp
Emotion (Washington, D.C.)|July 6, 2016
The influence of facial sex cues on emotional expression categorization is not fixedBelinda M Craig, Ottmar V Lipp
Biological Psychology|March 20, 1998
The effect of repeated prepulse and reflex stimulus presentations on startle prepulse inhibitionO V Lipp, S P Krinitzky
Cognition & Emotion|March 11, 2020
Measuring unconditional stimulus expectancy during evaluative conditioning strengthens explicit conditional stimulus valenceCamilla C Luck, Ottmar V Lipp
Cognition & Emotion|February 1, 2017
Verbal instructions targeting valence alter negative conditional stimulus evaluations (but do not affect reinstatement rates)Camilla C Luck, Ottmar V Lipp
Pageof 22