Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

V Lipp

Showing results (81-90 of 219) with videos related to

Pageof 22
Sort By:
Psychophysiology|September 4, 2023
The influence of instructions on reversing the generalization of valence, US expectancy, and electrodermal responding in fear conditioningRachel R Patterson, Ottmar V Lipp, Camilla C Luck
Biological Psychology|March 8, 1996
Effects of intermodality change and number of training trials on electrodermal orienting and on the allocation of processing resourcesD A Siddle, O V Lipp, P J Dall
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology|November 25, 2004
Attentional bias toward fear-related stimuli: an investigation with nonselected children and adults and children with anxiety disordersAllison M Waters, Ottmar V Lipp, Susan H Spence
Biological Psychology|December 29, 2004
The effects of affective picture stimuli on blink modulation in adults and childrenAllison M Waters, Ottmar V Lipp, Susan H Spence
Psychophysiology|April 23, 2004
The effect of stimulus modality and task difficulty on attentional modulation of blink startleDavid L Neumann, Ottmar V Lipp, Meredith J McHugh
Neuroscience Letters|October 3, 2006
Reaction time facilitation by acoustic task-irrelevant stimuli is not related to startleOttmar V Lipp, Daniel M Kaplan, Helena M Purkis
Cognition & Emotion|June 5, 2023
Emotion malleability beliefs predict daily positive and negative affect in adolescentsJing Zhang, Siwen Guo, Ottmar V Lipp, et al.
Psychophysiology|March 17, 2023
The influence of cross unconditional stimulus reinstatement on electrodermal responding and conditional stimulus valence in differential fear conditioningCamilla C Luck, Rachel R Patterson, Ottmar V Lipp
Psychophysiology|July 1, 1997
The effect of unconditional stimulus modality and intensity on blink startle and electrodermal responsesD A Siddle, O V Lipp, P J Dall
Psychophysiology|November 30, 2021
The absence of differential electrodermal responding in the second half of acquisition does not indicate the absence of fear learningOttmar V Lipp, Camilla C Luck, Allison M Waters
Pageof 22

Showing results (81-90 of 219) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 22
Psychophysiology|September 4, 2023
The influence of instructions on reversing the generalization of valence, US expectancy, and electrodermal responding in fear conditioningRachel R Patterson, Ottmar V Lipp, Camilla C Luck
Biological Psychology|March 8, 1996
Effects of intermodality change and number of training trials on electrodermal orienting and on the allocation of processing resourcesD A Siddle, O V Lipp, P J Dall
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology|November 25, 2004
Attentional bias toward fear-related stimuli: an investigation with nonselected children and adults and children with anxiety disordersAllison M Waters, Ottmar V Lipp, Susan H Spence
Biological Psychology|December 29, 2004
The effects of affective picture stimuli on blink modulation in adults and childrenAllison M Waters, Ottmar V Lipp, Susan H Spence
Psychophysiology|April 23, 2004
The effect of stimulus modality and task difficulty on attentional modulation of blink startleDavid L Neumann, Ottmar V Lipp, Meredith J McHugh
Neuroscience Letters|October 3, 2006
Reaction time facilitation by acoustic task-irrelevant stimuli is not related to startleOttmar V Lipp, Daniel M Kaplan, Helena M Purkis
Cognition & Emotion|June 5, 2023
Emotion malleability beliefs predict daily positive and negative affect in adolescentsJing Zhang, Siwen Guo, Ottmar V Lipp, et al.
Psychophysiology|March 17, 2023
The influence of cross unconditional stimulus reinstatement on electrodermal responding and conditional stimulus valence in differential fear conditioningCamilla C Luck, Rachel R Patterson, Ottmar V Lipp
Psychophysiology|July 1, 1997
The effect of unconditional stimulus modality and intensity on blink startle and electrodermal responsesD A Siddle, O V Lipp, P J Dall
Psychophysiology|November 30, 2021
The absence of differential electrodermal responding in the second half of acquisition does not indicate the absence of fear learningOttmar V Lipp, Camilla C Luck, Allison M Waters
Pageof 22