Showing results (1-10 of 15) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
Hormones and Behavior|December 30, 2021
Hormones, ovulatory cycle phase and pathogen disgust: A longitudinal investigation of the Compensatory Prophylaxis HypothesisJulia Stern, Victor Shiramizu
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics|November 13, 2025
Naïve listener judgements of speech sound change during speech intervention for children with cleft palate ± lip using a visual analogue scale, compared to expert ratingsMaria Cairney, Victor Shiramizu, Joanne Cleland
Trends in Cognitive Sciences|October 9, 2021
Does facial attractiveness really signal immunocompetence?Benedict C Jones, Iris J Holzleitner, Victor Shiramizu
British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)|June 18, 2024
Decoding the language of first impressions: Comparing models of first impressions of faces derived from free-text descriptions and trait ratingsAlex L Jones, Victor Shiramizu, Benedict C Jones
British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)|December 4, 2022
Mapping physical characteristics in face images to social judgementsBenedict C Jones, Alex L Jones, Victor Shiramizu
Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine : JCSM : Official Publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine|August 1, 2022
Sleep reactivity predicts insomnia in patients diagnosed with breast cancerAliyah Rehman, Christopher L Drake, Victor Shiramizu, et al.
Plos One|November 13, 2020
Sexual orientation predicts men's preferences for sexually dimorphic face-shape characteristics: A replication studyVictor Shiramizu, Ciaran Docherty, Lisa M DeBruine, et al.
Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland)|April 10, 2024
The impact of symptom clusters on endocrine therapy adherence in patients with breast cancerSommer Agnew, Megan Crawford, Iain MacPherson, et al.
Plos One|March 6, 2020
No evidence that partnered and unpartnered gay men differ in their preferences for male facial masculinityRachel Cassar, Victor Shiramizu, Lisa M DeBruine, et al.
Hormones and Behavior|March 20, 2026
Little evidence for group differences in 2D:4D ratios based on sexual orientation after adjusting for publication biasVictor Shiramizu, František Bartoš, Benedict C Jones, et al.
Pageof 2