Showing results (1-10 of 181) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 19
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science|August 1, 1985
Statistical analysis of multi-eye data in ophthalmic researchW A Ray, D M O'DayCurrent Eye Research|May 1, 1985
Statistical analysis for experimental models of ocular disease: continuous response measuresW A Ray, D M O'Day, W S Head, et al.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science|March 1, 1984
Efficacy of antifungal agents in the cornea. II. Influence of corticosteroidsD M O'Day, W A Ray, R Robinson, et al.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science|July 1, 1984
Influence of the corneal epithelium on the efficacy of topical antifungal agentsD M O'Day, W A Ray, W S Head, et al.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science|March 1, 1987
Correlation of in vitro and in vivo susceptibility of Candida albicans to amphotericin B and natamycinD M O'Day, W A Ray, R D Robinson, et al.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science|July 1, 1984
Efficacy of antifungal agents in the cornea. IV. Amphotericin B methyl esterD M O'Day, W A Ray, W S Head, et al.Current Eye Research|July 1, 1984
Variability in isolate recovery rates from multiple and single breeds of outbred pigmented rabbits in an experimental model of Candida keratitisW A Ray, D M O'Day, W S Head, et al.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science|May 1, 1987
In vitro and in vivo susceptibility of Candida keratitis to topical polyenesD M O'Day, W A Ray, R D Robinson, et al.Current Eye Research|February 1, 1987
The influence of yeast growth phase in vivo on the efficacy of topical polyenesD M O'Day, W A Ray, R D Robinson, et al.Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science|April 1, 1991
Differences in response in vivo to amphotericin B among Candida albicans strainsD M O'Day, W A Ray, R D Robinson, et al.Pageof 19