Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

W K Lutz

Showing results (1-10 of 120) with videos related to

Pageof 12
Sort By:
Mutation Research|September 6, 2001
Susceptibility differences in chemical carcinogenesis linearize the dose-response relationship: threshold doses can be defined only for individualsW K Lutz
Mutation Research|May 1, 1990
Endogenous genotoxic agents and processes as a basis of spontaneous carcinogenesisW K Lutz
Das Offentliche Gesundheitswesen|May 1, 1990
[Dose-response relations in chemical carcinogenesis]W K Lutz
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology|January 1, 1991
Dose-response relationships in chemical carcinogenesis: from DNA adducts to tumor incidenceW K Lutz
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology|January 1, 1986
Quantitative evaluation of DNA binding data for risk estimation and for classification of direct and indirect carcinogensW K Lutz
Human & Experimental Toxicology|February 24, 2001
A true threshold dose in chemical carcinogenesis cannot be defined for a population, irrespective of the mode of actionW K Lutz
Toxicologic Pathology|January 1, 1986
Endogenous formaldehyde does not produce detectable DNA-protein crosslinks in rat liverW K Lutz
Mutation Research|September 28, 1998
Dose-response relationships in chemical carcinogenesis: superposition of different mechanisms of action, resulting in linear-nonlinear curves, practical thresholds, J-shapesW K Lutz
Carcinogenesis|August 1, 1990
Dose-response relationship and low dose extrapolation in chemical carcinogenesisW K Lutz
Human & Experimental Toxicology|January 11, 2000
Dose-response relationships in chemical carcinogenesis reflect differences in individual susceptibility. Consequences for cancer risk assessment, extrapolation, and preventionW K Lutz
Pageof 12

Showing results (1-10 of 120) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 12
Mutation Research|September 6, 2001
Susceptibility differences in chemical carcinogenesis linearize the dose-response relationship: threshold doses can be defined only for individualsW K Lutz
Mutation Research|May 1, 1990
Endogenous genotoxic agents and processes as a basis of spontaneous carcinogenesisW K Lutz
Das Offentliche Gesundheitswesen|May 1, 1990
[Dose-response relations in chemical carcinogenesis]W K Lutz
Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology|January 1, 1991
Dose-response relationships in chemical carcinogenesis: from DNA adducts to tumor incidenceW K Lutz
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology|January 1, 1986
Quantitative evaluation of DNA binding data for risk estimation and for classification of direct and indirect carcinogensW K Lutz
Human & Experimental Toxicology|February 24, 2001
A true threshold dose in chemical carcinogenesis cannot be defined for a population, irrespective of the mode of actionW K Lutz
Toxicologic Pathology|January 1, 1986
Endogenous formaldehyde does not produce detectable DNA-protein crosslinks in rat liverW K Lutz
Mutation Research|September 28, 1998
Dose-response relationships in chemical carcinogenesis: superposition of different mechanisms of action, resulting in linear-nonlinear curves, practical thresholds, J-shapesW K Lutz
Carcinogenesis|August 1, 1990
Dose-response relationship and low dose extrapolation in chemical carcinogenesisW K Lutz
Human & Experimental Toxicology|January 11, 2000
Dose-response relationships in chemical carcinogenesis reflect differences in individual susceptibility. Consequences for cancer risk assessment, extrapolation, and preventionW K Lutz
Pageof 12