Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

Wendy C Higgins

Showing results (1-10 of 11) with videos related to

Pageof 2
Sort By:
Assessment|March 29, 2025
Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Scores Demonstrate Poor Structural Properties in Nine Large Non-Clinical SamplesWendy C Higgins, Victoria Savalei, Vince Polito, et al.
Journal of Medical Ethics|July 3, 2020
Against the use and publication of contemporary unethical research: the case of Chinese transplant researchWendy C Higgins, Wendy A Rogers, Angela Ballantyne, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|December 18, 2023
Validation of the reading the mind in the eyes test requires an interpretable factor modelWendy C Higgins, Victoria Savalei, Vince Polito, et al.
Journal of Medical Ethics|September 15, 2020
Responding to unethical research: the importance of transparencyWendy A Rogers, Wendy C Higgins, Angela Ballantyne, et al.
Assessment|September 20, 2022
The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test Shows Poor Psychometric Properties in a Large, Demographically Representative U.S. SampleWendy C Higgins, Robert M Ross, Robyn Langdon, et al.
Clinical Psychology Review|January 17, 2024
Construct validity evidence reporting practices for the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: A systematic scoping reviewWendy C Higgins, David M Kaplan, Eliane Deschrijver, et al.
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews|February 14, 2023
Three threats to the validity of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: A commentary onWendy C Higgins, Robert M Ross, Vince Polito, et al.
Clinical Psychology Review|December 19, 2024
Why most research based on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test is unsubstantiated and uninterpretable: A response to Murphy and Hall (2024)Wendy C Higgins, David M Kaplan, Eliane Deschrijver, et al.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science|January 23, 2026
Rethinking psychological measurement: Validity potential versus realised validityWendy C Higgins, David M Kaplan, Alexander J Gillett, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour|July 9, 2024
Author Correction: Self-administered mindfulness interventions reduce stress in a large, randomized controlled multi-site studyAlessandro Sparacio, Hans IJzerman, Ivan Ropovik, et al.
Pageof 2

Showing results (1-10 of 11) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 2
Assessment|March 29, 2025
Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Scores Demonstrate Poor Structural Properties in Nine Large Non-Clinical SamplesWendy C Higgins, Victoria Savalei, Vince Polito, et al.
Journal of Medical Ethics|July 3, 2020
Against the use and publication of contemporary unethical research: the case of Chinese transplant researchWendy C Higgins, Wendy A Rogers, Angela Ballantyne, et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America|December 18, 2023
Validation of the reading the mind in the eyes test requires an interpretable factor modelWendy C Higgins, Victoria Savalei, Vince Polito, et al.
Journal of Medical Ethics|September 15, 2020
Responding to unethical research: the importance of transparencyWendy A Rogers, Wendy C Higgins, Angela Ballantyne, et al.
Assessment|September 20, 2022
The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test Shows Poor Psychometric Properties in a Large, Demographically Representative U.S. SampleWendy C Higgins, Robert M Ross, Robyn Langdon, et al.
Clinical Psychology Review|January 17, 2024
Construct validity evidence reporting practices for the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: A systematic scoping reviewWendy C Higgins, David M Kaplan, Eliane Deschrijver, et al.
Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews|February 14, 2023
Three threats to the validity of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test: A commentary onWendy C Higgins, Robert M Ross, Vince Polito, et al.
Clinical Psychology Review|December 19, 2024
Why most research based on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test is unsubstantiated and uninterpretable: A response to Murphy and Hall (2024)Wendy C Higgins, David M Kaplan, Eliane Deschrijver, et al.
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science|January 23, 2026
Rethinking psychological measurement: Validity potential versus realised validityWendy C Higgins, David M Kaplan, Alexander J Gillett, et al.
Nature Human Behaviour|July 9, 2024
Author Correction: Self-administered mindfulness interventions reduce stress in a large, randomized controlled multi-site studyAlessandro Sparacio, Hans IJzerman, Ivan Ropovik, et al.
Pageof 2