Showing results (1141-1150 of 2,404) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 241
Acta Orthopaedica|March 22, 2014
Hip-inspired implant for revision of failed reverse shoulder arthroplasty with severe glenoid bone loss. Improved clinical outcome in 11 patients at 3-year follow-upOfir Uri, Ian Bayley, Simon LambertActa Orthopaedica|January 28, 2014
Incomplete periacetabular acetabuloplastyBelen Carsi, Sariyah Al-Hallao, Karim Wahed, et al.Acta Orthopaedica|January 30, 2007
Altered expression of mitochondrial genes in response to fracture in old ratsMartha H Meyer, Ralph A MeyerActa Orthopaedica|October 28, 2006
Metabolism and catabolism in hip fracture patients: nutritional and anabolic intervention--a reviewMargareta Hedström, Olle Ljungqvist, Tommy CederholmActa Orthopaedica|June 28, 2023
Increasing risk of revision due to infection after primary total hip arthroplasty: results from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register AssociationHåvard Dale, Anne Marie Fenstad, Geir Hallan, et al.Acta Orthopaedica|June 22, 2023
The incidence of physeal fractures in the lower limb and the frequency of premature physeal closure: a cohort study of 236 patientsDavid A L W Cant, Christian FaergemannActa Orthopaedica|July 26, 2023
Computed tomography-based radiostereometric analysis in orthopedic research: practical guidelinesOlof H Sandberg, Johan Kärrholm, Henrik Olivecrona, et al.Acta Orthopaedica|July 31, 2023
No difference in the use of revision components and rerevision rate in conversion to total knee replacement following Oxford Partial Knee Microplasty Instrumentation: a registry study of 529 conversionsStephan J Van Langeveld, Stein J Janssen, Koen L M Koenraadt, et al.Acta Orthopaedica|August 1, 2023
No difference in risk of revision due to infection between clindamycin and cephalosporins as antibiotic prophylaxis in cemented primary total knee replacements: a report from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 2005-2020Karola Pawloy, Anne Marie Fenstad, Tesfaye Leta, et al.Acta Orthopaedica|July 26, 2023
The extent of first-time THA revision is not associated with patient-reported outcomes at 1-year follow-up: a study of 426 aseptic revisionsSiri B Winther, Jomar Klaksvik, Olav A Foss, et al.Pageof 241