Showing results (451-460 of 3,876) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 388
Ear and Hearing|August 6, 2005
Cochlear implant outcome is not influenced by the choice of earHoward W Francis, Jennifer D Yeagle, Stephen Bowditch, et al.Ear and Hearing|August 6, 2005
Genetic algorithms for adaptive psychophysical procedures: recipient-directed design of speech-processor MAPsGregory H Wakefield, Chris van den Honert, Wendy Parkinson, et al.Ear and Hearing|August 6, 2005
Two new directions in speech processor design for cochlear implantsBlake S Wilson, Reinhold Schatzer, Enrique A Lopez-Poveda, et al.Ear and Hearing|January 6, 2007
Effect of intratympanic application of aminoglycosides on click-evoked myogenic potentials in Guinea pigsAn-Shiou Day, June-Horng Lue, Ting-Hua Yang, et al.Ear and Hearing|November 7, 2006
Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humansJohn J GuinanEar and Hearing|November 7, 2006
Effects of programming threshold and maplaw settings on acoustic thresholds and speech discrimination with the MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implantPaul J BoydEar and Hearing|November 7, 2006
The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: is there an added value for early implantation?Carol McDonald Connor, Holly K Craig, Stephen W Raudenbush, et al.Ear and Hearing|November 7, 2006
Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant usersGail S Donaldson, Heather A KreftEar and Hearing|November 7, 2006
A systematic review of the nonacoustic benefits of bone-anchored hearing AIDSCarole E Johnson, Jeffrey L Danhauer, Amber C Reith, et al.Ear and Hearing|November 7, 2006
Comparing cochlear implant users' speech performance with processor fittings based on conventionally determined T and C levels or on compound action potential thresholds and live-voice speech in a prospective balanced crossover studyChristina Willeboer, Guido F SmoorenburgPageof 388