Showing results (2061-2070 of 2,479) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 248
Forensic Science International. Genetics|July 27, 2024
Development and validation of a novel forensic STR multiplex assay for blue (Anthropoides paradiseus), wattled (Bugeranus carunculatus), and grey-crowned crane (Balearica regulorum)Marli de Bruyn, Desiré Lee Dalton, Monica Mwale, et al.Forensic Science International. Genetics|November 22, 2019
DNA detection of a temporary and original user of an office spaceMariya Goray, Bas Kokshoorn, Kristy Steensma, et al.Forensic Science International. Genetics|November 23, 2019
Looking for the pinpoint: Optimizing identification, recovery and DNA extraction of micro traces in forensic caseworkLisa Dierig, Max Schmidt, Peter WiegandForensic Science International. Genetics|November 25, 2019
PIMA: A population informative multiplex for the AmericasC Carvalho Gontijo, L G Porras-Hurtado, A Freire-Aradas, et al.Forensic Science International. Genetics|November 12, 2019
Inter and intra-individual variation in skeletal DNA preservation in buried remainsAlexandra L Emmons, Jonathan Davoren, Jennifer M DeBruyn, et al.Forensic Science International. Genetics|November 28, 2019
Mitochondrial DNA variation in Sub-Saharan Africa: Forensic data from a mixed West African sample, Côte d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast), and RwandaTanja M K Göbel, Martin Bodner, Carlo Robino, et al.Forensic Science International. Genetics|November 5, 2019
A novel test for determination of wild felid-domestic cat hybridizationE S Chiu, K Fox, L Wolfe, et al.Forensic Science International. Genetics|February 12, 2019
A "forensic biobank" to establish comprehensive genetic frequency data for SwitzerlandMartin Zieger, Silvia UtzForensic Science International. Genetics|December 29, 2020
Comparison of bone demineralisation procedures for DNA recovery from burned remainsMeghan Mckinnon, Denice HigginsForensic Science International. Genetics|January 2, 2021
Juror understanding of the weight of evidence presented as a likelihood ratio and the impact on the deliberative process: a response to Buckleton, et alBess StiffelmanPageof 248