Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

IRB

Showing results (281-290 of 778) with videos related to

Pageof 78
Sort By:
IRB|November 1, 1985
Consent to research with impaired human subjects: a trial policy for the intramural programs of the National Institutes of HealthJohn C Fletcher, F William Dommel, Daniel D Cowell
IRB|March 1, 1986
Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review BoardCarol Levine, Arthur L Caplan
IRB|September 1, 1985
The investigator's duty not to deceiveBrian Cupples, Myron Gochnauer
IRB|September 1, 1985
The wages of sinE L Pattullo
IRB|July 1, 1995
Experiment spot-checks: a method for assessing the educational value of undergraduate participation in researchR Eric Landrum, Garvin Chastain
IRB|May 1, 1995
Medical battery and failure to obtain informed consent: Illinois court decision suggests potential for IRB liabilityTheodore R LeBlang
IRB|October 20, 2001
Monitoring informed consent in an oncology study posing serious risk to subjectsMyrian Skrutkowski, Charles Weijer, Stan Shapiro, et al.
IRB|October 20, 2001
Report regarding: Karlin et al. v. Foust et al., August 12, 1996Basil Jackson
IRB|February 1, 1982
Contraceptive research: do sex partners have rights?Angela R Holder
IRB|January 1, 1988
Enhancing comprehension of information for informed consent: a review of empirical researchMary Cipriano Silva, Jeanne Merkle Sorrell
Pageof 78

Showing results (281-290 of 778) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 78
IRB|November 1, 1985
Consent to research with impaired human subjects: a trial policy for the intramural programs of the National Institutes of HealthJohn C Fletcher, F William Dommel, Daniel D Cowell
IRB|March 1, 1986
Beyond localism: a proposal for a National Research Review BoardCarol Levine, Arthur L Caplan
IRB|September 1, 1985
The investigator's duty not to deceiveBrian Cupples, Myron Gochnauer
IRB|September 1, 1985
The wages of sinE L Pattullo
IRB|July 1, 1995
Experiment spot-checks: a method for assessing the educational value of undergraduate participation in researchR Eric Landrum, Garvin Chastain
IRB|May 1, 1995
Medical battery and failure to obtain informed consent: Illinois court decision suggests potential for IRB liabilityTheodore R LeBlang
IRB|October 20, 2001
Monitoring informed consent in an oncology study posing serious risk to subjectsMyrian Skrutkowski, Charles Weijer, Stan Shapiro, et al.
IRB|October 20, 2001
Report regarding: Karlin et al. v. Foust et al., August 12, 1996Basil Jackson
IRB|February 1, 1982
Contraceptive research: do sex partners have rights?Angela R Holder
IRB|January 1, 1988
Enhancing comprehension of information for informed consent: a review of empirical researchMary Cipriano Silva, Jeanne Merkle Sorrell
Pageof 78