Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (621-630 of 778) with videos related to
Page
of 78
Sort By:
IRB
|
November 1, 1980
HHS publishes final debarment regulations
Carol Levine
IRB
|
January 1, 1981
DHHS internal policies for reviewing research involving children
Natalie Reatig
IRB
|
January 1, 1981
Research on 'nonconsentables': commentary
Robert M Veatch
IRB
|
September 1, 1994
Research with radiation and healthy children: greater than minimal risk
William L Freeman
IRB
|
January 1, 1995
The ethics of phase I pediatric oncology trials
Terrence F Ackerman
IRB
|
October 20, 2001
The noninstitutional review board: what distinguishes us from them?
Erica Heath
IRB
|
June 1, 1982
Random-sampling: a modest proposal for reforming IRB review
Arthur L Caplan
IRB
|
June 1, 1982
Paying money to research subjects
Andrew L Taylor, Stuart M Brown, Ruth Macklin
IRB
|
November 1, 1984
At risk for AIDS: confidentiality in research and surveillance
Alvin Novik
IRB
|
October 20, 2001
General provisional proxy consent to research: redefining the role of the local research ethics board
Daryl Pullman
Page
of 78
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (621-630 of 778) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 78
IRB
|
November 1, 1980
HHS publishes final debarment regulations
Carol Levine
IRB
|
January 1, 1981
DHHS internal policies for reviewing research involving children
Natalie Reatig
IRB
|
January 1, 1981
Research on 'nonconsentables': commentary
Robert M Veatch
IRB
|
September 1, 1994
Research with radiation and healthy children: greater than minimal risk
William L Freeman
IRB
|
January 1, 1995
The ethics of phase I pediatric oncology trials
Terrence F Ackerman
IRB
|
October 20, 2001
The noninstitutional review board: what distinguishes us from them?
Erica Heath
IRB
|
June 1, 1982
Random-sampling: a modest proposal for reforming IRB review
Arthur L Caplan
IRB
|
June 1, 1982
Paying money to research subjects
Andrew L Taylor, Stuart M Brown, Ruth Macklin
IRB
|
November 1, 1984
At risk for AIDS: confidentiality in research and surveillance
Alvin Novik
IRB
|
October 20, 2001
General provisional proxy consent to research: redefining the role of the local research ethics board
Daryl Pullman
Page
of 78