Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Filters

IRB

Showing results (691-700 of 778) with videos related to

Pageof 78
Sort By:
IRB|July 1, 1996
The Prussian regulation of 1900: early ethical standards for human experimentation in GermanyJochen Vollmann, Rolf Winau
IRB|October 20, 2001
A relational perspective on ethics-in-science decisionmaking for research with vulnerable populationsCelia B Fisher
IRB|October 20, 2001
The "best proven therapeutic method" standard in clinical trials in technologically developing countriesRobert J Levine
IRB|March 1, 1988
Reviewing research involving children: the practice of British research ethics committeesDavid Hall
IRB|July 1, 1989
The frozen embryo and divorceAngela R Holder
IRB|September 1, 1984
How many protocols are deferred? One IRB's experienceRowan T Chlebowski
IRB|January 1, 1996
Drug-free research in schizophrenia: an overview of the controversyPaul S Appelbaum
IRB|October 20, 2001
Children and decisionmaking in health researchFrançoise Baylis, Jocelyn Downie, Nuala Kenny
IRB|November 8, 2001
Conflict between research design and minimization of risks in pediatric researchB Gordon, E Prentice, J Anderson
IRB|November 8, 2001
How to interpret the federal policy for the protection of human subjects or "Common Rule" (Part A). [for the Working Group of the Human Subjects Research Subcommittee of the National Science and Technology Council]J D Shelton
Pageof 78

Showing results (691-700 of 778) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 78
IRB|July 1, 1996
The Prussian regulation of 1900: early ethical standards for human experimentation in GermanyJochen Vollmann, Rolf Winau
IRB|October 20, 2001
A relational perspective on ethics-in-science decisionmaking for research with vulnerable populationsCelia B Fisher
IRB|October 20, 2001
The "best proven therapeutic method" standard in clinical trials in technologically developing countriesRobert J Levine
IRB|March 1, 1988
Reviewing research involving children: the practice of British research ethics committeesDavid Hall
IRB|July 1, 1989
The frozen embryo and divorceAngela R Holder
IRB|September 1, 1984
How many protocols are deferred? One IRB's experienceRowan T Chlebowski
IRB|January 1, 1996
Drug-free research in schizophrenia: an overview of the controversyPaul S Appelbaum
IRB|October 20, 2001
Children and decisionmaking in health researchFrançoise Baylis, Jocelyn Downie, Nuala Kenny
IRB|November 8, 2001
Conflict between research design and minimization of risks in pediatric researchB Gordon, E Prentice, J Anderson
IRB|November 8, 2001
How to interpret the federal policy for the protection of human subjects or "Common Rule" (Part A). [for the Working Group of the Human Subjects Research Subcommittee of the National Science and Technology Council]J D Shelton
Pageof 78