Showing results (271-280 of 1,191) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 120
Law and Human Behavior|March 2, 2026
Scientific impact, diversity, and open science at Law and human behavior (2012-2017)Margaret Bull KoveraLaw and Human Behavior|April 11, 2024
The power of meaningful numbers: Attorney guidance and jury deliberation improve the reliability and gist validity of damage awardsKrystia Reed, Valerie P Hans, Vivian Rotenstein, et al.Law and Human Behavior|April 13, 2026
Are feigning screens "competent to stand trial"? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test, Atypical Presentation Scales, and Structured Inventory of Malingered SymptomatologyNishant Krishnan, Michael D Trood, Janet Ruffles, et al.Law and Human Behavior|April 27, 2026
From culture blind to culturally informed: Coverage of sociocultural identities in U.S.-based forensic psychology journals, 2016-2020Amanda M Fanniff, Leila N Wallach, Taylor York, et al.Law and Human Behavior|July 9, 2026
Juries are different: Racial and ethnic differences in trust across legal institutionsMelanie B Fessinger, Hannah J Rath, Daryl A WoutLaw and Human Behavior|July 9, 2026
The predictive utility of youth psychopathic traits on subsequent psychopathy and offendingScarlet J Cho, Elizabeth CauffmanLaw and Human Behavior|January 24, 2020
Classification accuracy of the rare symptoms and symptom combinations scales of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology in three archival samplesJohn F Edens, Tiffany N Truong, Randy K OttoLaw and Human Behavior|December 15, 2022
Further action toward valid science in Law and Human Behavior: Requiring open data, analytic code, and research materialsBradley D McAuliff, David DeMatteo, Jennifer Cox, et al.Law and Human Behavior|December 15, 2022
Does the affirmative consent standard increase the accuracy of sexual assault perceptions? It depends on how you learn about the standardAbigail R Riemer, Kathryn Holland, Evan McCracken, et al.Pageof 120