Search research articles
Contact Us
Filters
Showing results (111-120 of 8,823) with videos related to
Page
of 883
Sort By:
Meat Science
|
April 18, 2016
Consciousness, unconsciousness and death in the context of slaughter. Part II. Evaluation methods
Claudia Terlouw, Cécile Bourguet, Véronique Deiss
Meat Science
|
March 13, 2016
Functional or constructive attitudes: Which type drives consumers' evaluation of meat products?
Robert Hamlin
Meat Science
|
March 13, 2016
Characterization of the fatty acid composition of lamb commercially available in northern Spain: Emphasis on the trans-18:1 and CLA content and profile
Leire Bravo-Lamas, Luis J R Barron, John K G Kramer, et al.
Meat Science
|
March 14, 2016
Application of small angle X-ray scattering synchrotron technology for measuring ovine meat quality
J M Hoban, D L Hopkins, N Kirby, et al.
Meat Science
|
June 24, 2016
Carbon monoxide concentration and exposure time effects on the depth of CO penetration and surface color of raw and cooked beef longissimus lumborum steaks
A Sakowska, D Guzek, D Głąbska, et al.
Meat Science
|
June 21, 2016
Reporting the sensory properties of dry-cured ham using a new language: Time intensity (TI) and temporal dominance of sensations (TDS)
Laura Lorido, Joanne Hort, Mario Estévez, et al.
Meat Science
|
May 24, 2016
Effect of fresh pork meat conditioning on quality characteristics of salami
Cristina Alamprese, Lorenzo Fongaro, Ernestina Casiraghi
Meat Science
|
July 3, 2016
Evolution of proteolytic and physico-chemical characteristics of Norwegian dry-cured ham during its processing
Inna Petrova, Ignat Tolstorebrov, Leticia Mora, et al.
Meat Science
|
November 13, 2015
Identifying consumer preferences for specific beef flavor characteristics in relation to cattle production and postmortem processing parameters
T G O'Quinn, D R Woerner, T E Engle, et al.
Meat Science
|
November 12, 2015
Consumer palatability scores, sensory descriptive attributes, and volatile compounds of grilled beef steaks from three USDA Quality Grades
J F Legako, T T N Dinh, M F Miller, et al.
Page
of 883
Search research articles
Search
Showing results (111-120 of 8,823) with videos related to
Sort By:
Page
of 883
Meat Science
|
April 18, 2016
Consciousness, unconsciousness and death in the context of slaughter. Part II. Evaluation methods
Claudia Terlouw, Cécile Bourguet, Véronique Deiss
Meat Science
|
March 13, 2016
Functional or constructive attitudes: Which type drives consumers' evaluation of meat products?
Robert Hamlin
Meat Science
|
March 13, 2016
Characterization of the fatty acid composition of lamb commercially available in northern Spain: Emphasis on the trans-18:1 and CLA content and profile
Leire Bravo-Lamas, Luis J R Barron, John K G Kramer, et al.
Meat Science
|
March 14, 2016
Application of small angle X-ray scattering synchrotron technology for measuring ovine meat quality
J M Hoban, D L Hopkins, N Kirby, et al.
Meat Science
|
June 24, 2016
Carbon monoxide concentration and exposure time effects on the depth of CO penetration and surface color of raw and cooked beef longissimus lumborum steaks
A Sakowska, D Guzek, D Głąbska, et al.
Meat Science
|
June 21, 2016
Reporting the sensory properties of dry-cured ham using a new language: Time intensity (TI) and temporal dominance of sensations (TDS)
Laura Lorido, Joanne Hort, Mario Estévez, et al.
Meat Science
|
May 24, 2016
Effect of fresh pork meat conditioning on quality characteristics of salami
Cristina Alamprese, Lorenzo Fongaro, Ernestina Casiraghi
Meat Science
|
July 3, 2016
Evolution of proteolytic and physico-chemical characteristics of Norwegian dry-cured ham during its processing
Inna Petrova, Ignat Tolstorebrov, Leticia Mora, et al.
Meat Science
|
November 13, 2015
Identifying consumer preferences for specific beef flavor characteristics in relation to cattle production and postmortem processing parameters
T G O'Quinn, D R Woerner, T E Engle, et al.
Meat Science
|
November 12, 2015
Consumer palatability scores, sensory descriptive attributes, and volatile compounds of grilled beef steaks from three USDA Quality Grades
J F Legako, T T N Dinh, M F Miller, et al.
Page
of 883