Showing results (721-730 of 1,066) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 107
Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|September 9, 2015
Public perceptions of expert disagreement: Bias and incompetence or a complex and random world?Nathan F Dieckmann, Branden B Johnson, Robin Gregory, et al.Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|September 9, 2015
Citizen science on a smartphone: Participants' motivations and learningAnne M Land-Zandstra, Jeroen L A Devilee, Frans Snik, et al.Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|September 17, 2014
Deliberative Mapping of options for tackling climate change: Citizens and specialists 'open up' appraisal of geoengineeringRob Bellamy, Jason Chilvers, Naomi E VaughanPublic Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|August 8, 2014
Audience responses to television news coverage of medical advances: The mediating role of audience emotions and identificationHyehyun HongPublic Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|August 10, 2014
How did the fracking controversy emerge in the period 2010-2012?Allan MazurPublic Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|December 21, 2013
Communicating mega-projects in the face of uncertainties: Israeli mass media treatment of the Dead Sea Water CanalItay Fischhendler, Galit Cohen-Blankshtain, Yoav Shuali, et al.Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|April 1, 2016
Stylistic analysis of headlines in science journalism: A case study of New ScientistKatarzyna Molek-KozakowskaPublic Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|April 28, 2016
In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return?Gitte MeyerPublic Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|April 28, 2016
In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return? The eternal recurrence of the public deficitCarina CortassaPublic Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)|October 24, 2017
Understanding "understanding" in Public Understanding of ScienceJoanna K Huxster, Matthew H Slater, Jason Leddington, et al.Pageof 107