Showing results (101-110 of 209) with videos related to

Sort By:
Pageof 21
Research Integrity and Peer Review|June 23, 2026
From concept to measurement: operationalizing and normalizing Integrity Risk Indicators by SCImago (IRIS)Rodrigo Sánchez-Jiménez, Vicente P Guerrero-Bote, Gali Halevi, et al.
Research Integrity and Peer Review|July 18, 2026
Why researchers cut corners: motivations, pressures, and personality in questionable research practicesRobin Brooker
Research Integrity and Peer Review|August 6, 2026
TOP 2025: An update to the Transparency and Openness Promotion GuidelinesSean Grant, Katherine S Corker, David Mellor, et al.
Research Integrity and Peer Review|August 14, 2019
Critical review of the TransCelerate Template for clinical study reports (CSRs) and publication of Version 2 of the CORE Reference (Clarity and Openness in Reporting: E3-based) Terminology TableSamina Hamilton, Aaron B Bernstein, Graham Blakey, et al.
Research Integrity and Peer Review|February 1, 2021
Estimating the prevalence of text overlap in biomedical conference abstractsNick Kinney, Araba Wubah, Miguel Roig, et al.
Research Integrity and Peer Review|August 29, 2025
Reporting of measures against bias in nonclinical published research studies: a journal-based comparisonSara Steele, Tom Lavrijssen, Thomas Steckler
Research Integrity and Peer Review|September 20, 2019
Impact of peer review on discussion of study limitations and strength of claims in randomized trial reports: a before and after studyKerem Keserlioglu, Halil Kilicoglu, Gerben Ter Riet
Research Integrity and Peer Review|November 3, 2018
Students' and supervisors' knowledge and attitudes regarding plagiarism and referencingJohanna F Lindahl, Delia Grace
Research Integrity and Peer Review|July 13, 2019
Correction to: ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research IntegrityLex M Bouter, Joeri Tijdink, Nils Axelsen, et al.
Research Integrity and Peer Review|March 5, 2025
Analysis of indications for selectively missing results in comparative registry-based studies in medicine: a meta-research studyPaula Starke, Zhentian Zhang, Hannah Papmeier, et al.
Pageof 21