Showing results (151-160 of 210) with videos related to
Sort By:
Pageof 21
Research Integrity and Peer Review|October 28, 2020
Do journals instruct authors to address sex and gender in psychological science?Courtenay Cavanaugh, Yara Abu HusseinResearch Integrity and Peer Review|November 22, 2018
Correction to: The changing forms and expectations of peer reviewS P J M Serge Horbach, W Willem HalffmanResearch Integrity and Peer Review|February 16, 2021
Re-evaluation of solutions to the problem of unprofessionalism in peer reviewTravis G Gerwing, Alyssa M Allen Gerwing, Chi-Yeung Choi, et al.Research Integrity and Peer Review|March 30, 2025
How do oncology journals approach plagiarism? A website reviewJohanna Goldberg, Heather Snijdewind, Céline Soudant, et al.Research Integrity and Peer Review|June 10, 2025
Predicting retracted research: a dataset and machine learning approachesAaron H A Fletcher, Mark StevensonResearch Integrity and Peer Review|May 13, 2025
Research on policy mechanisms to address funding bias and conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a scoping reviewS Scott Graham, Quinn Grundy, Nandini Sharma, et al.Research Integrity and Peer Review|January 20, 2026
Gender reporting across regions and time in psychological studies: a scoping review of studies in psychological Science between 2019 and 2024Tiantian ChenResearch Integrity and Peer Review|February 2, 2019
Replicability and replication in the humanitiesRik PeelsResearch Integrity and Peer Review|March 21, 2018
Research Integrity and Peer Review-past highlights and future directionsStephanie L Boughton, Maria K Kowalczuk, Joerg J Meerpohl, et al.Research Integrity and Peer Review|February 17, 2018
Critical evaluation of the guidelines of the Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity and of their applicationLiisa Räsänen, Erja MoorePageof 21