Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

A Human Fallopian Tube Model for Investigation of C. trachomatis Infections
Published on: August 11, 2012
Screening for chlamydial infections in women with pelvic inflammatory diseases
A Chowdhary1, V L Malhotra, M Deb
1Department of Microbiology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi.
Insights
Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection is more effective than cytology for diagnosing chlamydial infections in pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Lower socioeconomic status and younger age correlated with higher antigen detection rates in PID patients.
Area of Science:
- Gynecology
- Infectious Diseases
- Microbiology
Background:
- Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is a significant gynecological infection.
- Chlamydial infections are a common cause of PID.
- Accurate and timely diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis is crucial for effective PID management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic efficacy of cytology and antigen detection for Chlamydia trachomatis in PID patients.
- To identify demographic factors associated with chlamydial infection in PID.
Main Methods:
- Studied 100 female patients diagnosed with PID.
- Utilized Giemsa-stained cervical smears for cytological examination to detect inclusion bodies.
- Employed the Immunocomb Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) test for direct antigen detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
Main Results:
- Cytology detected inclusion bodies in only 3% of cases.
- Antigen detection via EIA identified Chlamydia trachomatis in 13% of cases, indicating superior sensitivity.
- A significant correlation was observed between positive Chlamydia trachomatis antigen detection and younger age and lower socioeconomic status.
Conclusions:
- Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) for antigen detection is a more sensitive method than traditional cytology for diagnosing chlamydial infections in PID.
- Chlamydia trachomatis is associated with younger patients and those of lower socioeconomic status presenting with PID.
Abstract:
One hundred female patients clinically diagnosed as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) were studied for the presence of chlamydial infection by cytology and antigen detection. Cervical smears stained by Giemsa revealed inclusion bodies, only in 3 percent of cases. While using Immunocomb Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) test, antigen was detected in 13% of cases, thereby showing that antigen detection is a better method than cell cytology. A significant correlation with the low socioeconomic status and younger age group was seen in patients showing presence of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen.
More Related Videos
07:20Intraoperative Detection of Subtle Endometriosis: A Novel Paradigm for Detection and Treatment of Pelvic Pain Associated with the Loss of Peritoneal Integrity
Published on: December 21, 2012
07:42Using Fluorescent Proteins to Visualize and Quantitate Chlamydia Vacuole Growth Dynamics in Living Cells
Published on: October 13, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Trichomoniasis