Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2026

Flow-sorting and Exome Sequencing of the Reed-Sternberg Cells of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
Published on: June 10, 2017
Differentiating lymphoblastic lymphoma and Ewing's sarcoma: lymphocyte markers and gene rearrangement
M Ozdemirli1, J C Fanburg-Smith, D P Hartmann
1Department of Pathology, Georgetown University Medical Center, 3900 Reservoir Road N.W., Washington, DC 20007, USA.
Insights
Distinguishing Ewing's sarcoma (ES) from precursor B-lymphoblastic lymphoma is crucial. This study highlights key immunophenotypic markers and gene rearrangement studies, including CD79a, CD43, TdT, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), to avoid misdiagnosis in small round cell tumors.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pathology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Small round cell tumors, particularly Ewing's sarcoma (ES) and lymphoblastic lymphoma, present diagnostic challenges.
- Accurate differentiation is critical for appropriate patient treatment and prognosis.
Observation:
- A case initially diagnosed as ES was reclassified as precursor B-lymphoblastic lymphoma based on positivity for CD79a, CD43, TdT, and immunoglobulin heavy chain gene rearrangement (IgH-R) via polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
- Extensive investigation of 33 ES cases revealed consistent negativity for lymphoid markers (LCA, CD3, CD20, CD43, CD79a, TdT) and gene rearrangements (IgH-R, Tgamma-R).
Findings:
- Ewing's sarcoma (ES) is characterized by negativity for lymphoid markers and gene rearrangements.
- Precursor B-lymphoblastic lymphoma can exhibit varied immunophenotypic profiles, sometimes mimicking ES.
- Immunohistochemistry (CD79a, CD43, TdT) and PCR for IgH-R and Tgamma-R are essential for differential diagnosis.
Implications:
- Misdiagnosis between ES and lymphoblastic lymphoma can be avoided by comprehensive immunophenotypic and molecular analysis.
- Standard diagnostic criteria for ES should include negativity for lymphoid markers and gene rearrangements.
- Further evaluation of leukocyte antigens and gene rearrangement studies is recommended for challenging small round cell tumor cases.
Abstract:
We encountered a child with an intraosseous small round cell tumor that was negative for LCA, CD20 (L26), and CD3 and positive for vimentin, CD99 (MIC-2), and periodic acid-Schiff. The tumor exhibited rosette-like formations. This case was initially interpreted as Ewing's sarcoma (ES); however, additional studies revealed positivity for CD79a, CD43, and TdT expression, and an immunoglobulin heavy chain gene rearrangement (IgH-R) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) established this to be a precursor B-lymphoblastic lymphoma. Because the differential diagnosis of ES and lymphoblastic lymphoma can be difficult and the differential diagnostic value of leukocyte antigens and immunoglobulin heavy chain gene rearrangement studies have not been fully evaluated, we conducted a more extensive investigation on 33 (21 soft tissue and 12 intraosseous) ES cases. Cases were retrieved from the files of the Department of Pathology at Georgetown University and from the Soft Tissue Registry of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. The cases were studied by light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and PCR for IgH-R and T cell receptor gamma chain gene rearrangement (Tgamma-R). There were 17 females and 16 males; the mean age was 29.3 years. Locations included the extremities (n = 17) and trunk (n = 16). All cases fit the ES spectrum by light microscopy and immunohistochemistry, as previously determined, and were negative for lymphoid markers (LCA, CD3, CD20, CD43, CD79a, and TdT), CD10 and CD34. CD99 was positive in 31/33 and bcl-2 was weakly positive in 13/33 cases. All 21 cases studied for gene rearrangements by PCR were negative for IgH-R and Tgamma-R. Distinction of intraosseous lymphoblastic lymphoma from ES may be difficult because lymphomas may occasionally exhibit unexpected morphologic and immunophenotypic properties including LCA, CD3 and CD20 negativity and cytokeratin positivity. Additional analysis using CD79a, CD43, TdT, and PCR should be performed to avoid misdiagnosis. True ES is negative for lymphoid markers including CD79a, CD43, and TdT, as well as for IgH-R and Tgamma-R.
More Related Videos
09:02Immunoglobulin Gene Sequence Analysis In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: From Patient Material To Sequence Interpretation
Published on: November 26, 2018
09:58Mapping the Structure-Function Relationships of Disordered Oncogenic Transcription Factors Using Transcriptomic Analysis
Published on: June 27, 2020