Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2026

In vitro Assessment of Myocardial Protection following Hypothermia-Preconditioning in a Human Cardiac Myocytes Model
Published on: October 27, 2020
Warm and tepid cardioplegia: do they provide equal myocardial protection?
Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz1, Djamel Kaili, Sidney Chocron
1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Hôpital Jean-Minjoz, Besançon, France. pierre-emmanuel.falcoz@wanadoo.fr
Insights
This study found no significant difference in myocardial protection between warm and tepid cardioplegia during coronary artery bypass graft surgery, based on cardiac troponin I release. Both methods appear equally effective for patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Cardiology
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Cardiac troponin I (CTnI) is a validated biomarker for myocardial injury.
- Evaluating myocardial protection during cardiac surgery is critical.
- Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery requires effective myocardial preservation strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of intermittent antegrade warm cardioplegia versus tepid blood cardioplegia.
- To assess myocardial protection using cardiac troponin I (CTnI) release as the primary endpoint.
- To evaluate clinical and biological data for differences in myocardial protection.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, randomized study involving 70 patients undergoing first elective CABG.
- Patients were assigned to either warm or tepid cardioplegia groups.
- Serial CTnI concentrations were measured pre-cardiopulmonary bypass and at 6, 9, 12, and 24 hours post-reperfusion.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant difference in total CTnI release between warm (8.23 ± 20.5 μg) and tepid (3.19 ± 2.4 μg) cardioplegia groups (p=0.23).
- Adjusted CTnI concentrations did not differ between groups (p=0.06).
- Perioperative myocardial infarction occurred in 4 patients in the warm group versus none in the tepid group (p=0.12).
Conclusions:
- This study demonstrates no discernible advantage of warm over tepid cardioplegia for myocardial protection in CABG.
- Both clinical and biological data suggest comparable efficacy between the two cardioplegia strategies.
- Further research may explore specific patient subgroups or alternative myocardial protection techniques.
Background:
Cardiac troponin I (CTnI) has been shown to be a marker of myocardial injury. The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to compare intermittent antegrade warm cardioplegia with tepid blood cardioplegia in patients undergoing first elective coronary artery bypass graft, using CTnI release as the criterion for evaluating the adequacy of myocardial protection.
Methods:
Seventy patients were randomly assigned to one of two cardioplegia groups. CTnI concentrations were measured in serial venous blood samples drawn immediately before cardiopulmonary bypass and after aortic unclamping at 6, 9, 12, and 24 hours. Analysis of covariance with repeated measures was performed to test the effect of the type of cardioplegia and time on CTnI concentration.
Results:
The total amount of CTnI released (8.23 +/- 20.5 microg in the warm group and 3.19 +/- 2.4 microg in the tepid group) was not statistically different (p = 0.23). The CTnI concentration did not differ for any sample in either of the two groups when adjusted on ejection fraction and the number of preoperative myocardial infarctions (p = 0.06). No patient in the tepid group versus 4 patients in the warm group showed CTnI evidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (p = 0.12).
Conclusions:
Our study showed no preference for warm or tepid cardioplegia in terms of myocardial protection, either for clinical or biological data.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Decreased Body Temperature
Myocarditis I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

