Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Isolation of Murine Lymph Node Stromal Cells
Published on: August 19, 2014
Cellular and molecular mechanisms of B lymphocyte tolerance
1Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
Insights
Understanding B cell tolerance is crucial for self-tolerance, with clonal abortion and anergy as key mechanisms. Recent advances clarify B cell tolerance limits and antigen concentration effects.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular Biology
Background:
- The immune system's complexity arises from widely distributed, interdependent cells.
- Understanding one immune component requires knowledge of others, including tolerance and activation.
- B cell tolerance is a critical aspect of self-tolerance, with recent significant advancements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review progress in understanding B cell tolerance.
- To highlight key mechanisms of B cell tolerance, including clonal abortion and anergy.
- To discuss the role of antigen in tolerance induction and the limitations of current models.
Main Methods:
- Review of recent literature and transgenic models.
- Analysis of B cell tolerance mechanisms: clonal abortion/maturation arrest/deletion and clonal anergy.
- Examination of antigen concentration and location in tolerance induction.
Main Results:
- B cell tolerance is a vital component of self-tolerance.
- Clonal abortion/maturation arrest/deletion and clonal anergy are identified as primary tolerance mechanisms.
- Antigen affinity, location, and concentration critically influence tolerance induction, with anergy being reversible.
Conclusions:
- Significant progress has been made in understanding B cell tolerance, particularly through transgenic studies.
- The mechanisms of B cell tolerance, including anergy, are becoming clearer.
- Further research is needed on T cell-mediated suppression and its role in B cell tolerance.
Abstract:
A paradox of immunology is that the immune system is distributed so widely in the body, as a large number of cells that discharge most of their effector functions as single cells; but, at the same time, the elements of the system are so very interdependent, not only via specialized cell clusters and microenvironments, but also by mobile feedback loops, cellular and molecular. The end result is that one cannot really understand one element of the system without understanding every other, at least to a degree. Certainly, tolerance cannot be isolated from immune activation, nor B cell from T cell tolerance, rendering the task of the reviewer somewhat thankless. This being said, the last few years have seen wonderful progress in our grasp of B cell tolerance, to which the transgenic revolution has contributed a great deal. The fact that B cell tolerance exists as an important component of self-tolerance has been firmly established, as have the limits of the process in terms of both the survival of low-affinity antiself clonotypes and the question of location and concentration of antigen required for tolerance induction. Two processes have been identified as key alternatives: clonal abortion/maturation arrest/deletion and induction of clonal anergy. The latter requires a less strong Ig receptor crosslinking signal, may be partial, and is reversible. Recognition of these facts has prompted both experimentation and speculation on possible functions of the anergic cell. One unsatisfactory area, which we have not addressed because nothing like a consensus has been reached, is T cell-mediated suppression and its possible effects on tolerant states, including anergy induction in B cells. The phenomenology of suppression is too striking to sweep under the carpet, and suppressor T cell memory in particular (Adelstein et al., 1990) requires much more investigation; however, suppression has not been shown to play a major role in any of the best-studied transgenic models. These can readily be explained on the basis of direct interactions between the B cell target for abortion or anergy and the self antigen in question. The biochemical basis of discrimination between immunity and tolerance has also progressed, but not as fast. This is understandable, as so many signaling pathways have to come together for full immune induction, and as immaturity of the signal transduction pathway plays a profound role that must be studied in normal cells, with all the attendant difficulties of cell separation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Lymphoid Cells and Tissues
Lymphoid cells consist of various types of immune system cells. These include B and T lymphocytes, which are responsible for producing antibodies and killing infected cells, respectively. Dendritic cells act as messengers between the innate and adaptive...
Special Features of Adaptive Immunity
The primary cell types involved in adaptive immunity are T cells and B cells. Each type has a unique role in defending the body against pathogens. T cells are responsible for cell-mediated immunity. They identify and eliminate infected cells directly,...
Cells of the Adaptive Immune Response
Diversity of Antigen Receptors
Before encountering any antigen, lymphocytes express these receptors. On B cells, the antigen receptor is a membrane-bound antibody molecule called BCR; on T cells, it is a T cell receptor or TCR. B and T cell receptors are composed of two...
B Cell Activation and Differentiation
When naive B cells encounter a specific antigen that can bind to the B cell receptor (BCR) on their surface, they undergo sensitization to respond to the antigen's presence. Sensitization begins with...
Defense Against Bacterial Pathogens
Phagocytes
Phagocytes are the frontline soldiers of the immune system. They include neutrophils and macrophages. Neutrophils are the most abundant type of white blood cell and are quickly mobilized to the site of infection. Macrophages are larger cells that patrol...

