Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Examination of Thymic Positive and Negative Selection by Flow Cytometry
Published on: October 8, 2012
[Critical analysis of the immunological self/non-self model and of its implicit metaphysical foundations]
Thomas Pradeu1, Edgardo D Carosella
1Agrégé de philosophie, département de philosophie de l'Ecole normale supérieure Ulm-Paris, France. thomas.pradeu@ens.fr
Insights
The dominant self/non-self model in immunology is inaccurate. A new continuity hypothesis offers a better criterion for immunogenicity, challenging established immunological concepts.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Theoretical Biology
Context:
- The dominant theoretical model in immunology relies on the concepts of 'self' and 'non-self'.
- Determining a criterion for immunogenicity is crucial for understanding immune reactions.
- Existing models face challenges in defining these criteria accurately.
Purpose:
- To critically examine the conceptual and experimental basis of the self/non-self dichotomy in immunology.
- To challenge the adequacy and accuracy of the self/non-self model.
- To propose an alternative theoretical framework for immunology.
Summary:
- This study critiques the foundational 'self' and 'non-self' concepts in immunology, revealing their limitations.
- Conceptual and experimental analyses demonstrate the inadequacy of the self/non-self dichotomy.
- An alternative 'continuity hypothesis' is proposed, offering a novel criterion for immunogenicity.
Impact:
- Reevaluation or rejection of the current self/non-self model in immunology.
- Introduction of the 'continuity hypothesis' as a potential new paradigm.
- Provides a more robust theoretical foundation for understanding immune responses and immunogenicity.
Abstract:
An examination of the concepts used in immunology prompts us to wonder about the origins and the legitimacy of the notions of self and non-self, which constitute the core of the dominant theoretical model in this science. All theoretical reflection concerning immunology must aim at determining a criterion of immunogenicity, that is, an operational definition of the conditions in which an immune reaction occurs or does not occur. By criticizing both conceptually and experimentally the self/non-self vocabulary, we can demonstrate the inaccuracy and even the inadequacy of the dichotomy of self/non-self. Accordingly, the self/non-self model must be reexamined, or even rejected. On the basis of this critique, we can suggest an alternative theoretical hypothesis for immunology, based on the notion of continuity. The 'continuity hypothesis' developed here attempts to give a criterion of immunogenicity that avoids the reproaches leveled at the self model.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Self-Schemas
Understanding the Self
Understanding Self-Concept
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication

