A cell-based time-resolved fluorescence assay for selection of antibody reagents for G protein-coupled receptor

Jui-Lan Su1, Jim Fornwald, Philip Rivers

  • 1Department of Gene Expression and Protein Biochemistry, GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development, Five Moore Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA. jui-lan.c.su@gsk.com

Insights

A new cell-based time-resolved fluorescence (celTRF) immunoassay effectively pre-screens antibodies for G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) research. This assay accurately predicts antibody suitability for immunohistochemistry (IHC), unlike traditional ELISA methods.

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • Immunology
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are crucial drug targets, necessitating high-quality antibodies for research.
  • Traditional antibody screening methods like ELISA often fail to predict efficacy in downstream applications such as immunohistochemistry (IHC).
  • There is a need for reliable in vitro assays to pre-screen antibody suitability for IHC.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a cell-based time-resolved fluorescence (celTRF) immunoassay for pre-screening antibodies against GPCR peptides.
  • To assess the celTRF assay's ability to predict antibody suitability for immunohistochemistry (IHC).
  • To compare the predictive power of celTRF with traditional ELISA for IHC applications.

Main Methods:

  • GPCRs were expressed in Saos-2 cells using recombinant baculoviruses, creating a "screening lawn" fixed and permeabilized similarly to IHC tissue.
  • A dissociation-enhanced lanthanide fluorescence immunoassay (DELFIA) using Eu-labelled goat anti-rabbit IgG was employed for celTRF.
  • Over 150 anti-peptide reagents for 27 GPCRs were characterized, with manual and automated (Biomek FX, Sami) assay performance evaluated.

Main Results:

  • The celTRF assay demonstrated a broad dynamic range and high specificity and potency for antibody characterization.
  • All celTRF-positive antibodies were suitable for IHC, while ELISA alone did not reliably predict IHC utility.
  • A strong correlation between celTRF potency and IHC utility was observed, exemplified by anti-neuropeptide FF receptor 1 (NPFF1) antibodies.

Conclusions:

  • The celTRF immunoassay is the first automated in vitro assay for confident pre-selection of antibodies for IHC.
  • celTRF offers superior prediction of antibody utility for IHC compared to ELISA.
  • The celTRF assay is versatile and applicable to a wide range of GPCRs and other protein target classes.