Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Characterization of Metabolic Status in Nonhuman Primates with the Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test
Published on: November 13, 2016
Differences in circulating insulin levels following glargine administration
Fidaa Ibrahim1, Georges Bagnard, Philippe Boudou
1Unit of Transfert in Molecular Oncology and Hormonology, Saint-Louis University Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, France.
Insights
Two insulin immunoassays were evaluated in routine practice. The electro-chemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA) showed higher insulin results than the IRMA assay, particularly in patients treated with glargine insulin.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Laboratory Medicine
Background:
- Accurate insulin measurement is crucial for diagnosing and managing metabolic disorders.
- Two common immunoassays, IRMA and ECLIA, are used for insulin quantification.
- Understanding assay performance in routine practice, especially with specific treatments like glargine, is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the performance of two-site non-competitive insulin immunoassays, the BI-INSULIN assay (IRMA) and an electro-chemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA), in routine clinical practice.
- To assess the impact of glargine treatment on insulin measurements obtained by these assays.
Main Methods:
- A study involving 145 consecutive patients from an Endocrine Department was conducted.
- Patients underwent general endocrine and metabolic status investigations.
- Insulin levels were measured using both the IRMA and ECLIA methods.
Main Results:
- The ECLIA consistently yielded higher insulin results compared to the IRMA assay across most patients.
- A notable exception was observed in six patients treated with glargine, where the difference was less pronounced or reversed.
- This suggests a potential influence of glargine or its metabolites on assay performance.
Conclusions:
- Insulin levels measured by the Elecsys (ECLIA) system in patients treated with glargine are directly correlated with glargine biotransformation into its detectable metabolite (M1).
- The findings highlight the importance of considering specific therapeutic agents, such as glargine, when interpreting insulin immunoassay results.
- Assay selection and interpretation should account for potential interferences or specific analyte biotransformation pathways.
Objectives:
To evaluate two-site non competitive insulin immunoassays [BI-INSULIN assay (IRMA) and an electro-chemiluminescent immunoassay (ECLIA)] in routine practice.
Design And Methods:
We studied 145 consecutive patients attending our Endocrine Department for general endocrine explorations and metabolic status investigations.
Results:
The ECLIA yielded higher results than IRMA in all but six patients treated by glargine.
Conclusions:
Insulin levels measured by Elecsys in patients treated by glargine are directly related to glargine biotransformation into detectable metabolite (M1).
Related Concept Videos
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Insulin Formulations: Types and Delivery
Short-acting insulins are divided into rapid-acting...
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Glucagon-like Receptor Agonists
GLP-1, when administered in high doses intravenously, triggers insulin secretion, inhibits glucagon release, slows gastric emptying, reduces food intake, and restores normal insulin secretion. However, its rapid inactivation by the...
Hypoglycemia and Glucagon
Hormones Regulating Blood Glucose
In addition to accelerating glucose uptake and utilization, insulin has...

