Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 2, 2026
Intranasal Immunization and Milk Collection in Studies of Maternal Immunization in New Zealand White Rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus)
Published on: July 31, 2021
Comparison of four methods to assess colostral IgG concentration in dairy cows
Munashe Chigerwe1, Jeff W Tyler, John R Middleton
1Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Insights
Hydrometers and electronic refractometers effectively screen bovine colostrum for low immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels, unlike the weight of the first milking, which showed poor sensitivity.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary immunology
- Dairy science
- Colostrum quality assessment
Background:
- Colostral immunoglobulin G (IgG) is crucial for passive immunity transfer in newborn calves.
- Accurate and efficient assessment of colostral IgG concentration is vital for calf health management.
- Several methods exist to estimate IgG levels, but their diagnostic accuracy varies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of four different methods for measuring bovine colostral IgG concentration.
- To determine the optimal cut-point for each method to accurately identify low IgG levels (< 50 g/L).
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional study involving 160 Holstein dairy cows.
- 171 colostrum samples were analyzed using weight of the first milking, two hydrometers, and an electronic refractometer.
- Results were compared against radial immunodiffusion as the gold standard for IgG concentration determination.
Main Results:
- Hydrometers and the electronic refractometer demonstrated comparable and acceptable sensitivity (0.75-0.76) in detecting low IgG concentrations.
- The sensitivity of using the weight of the first milking was significantly lower (0.42).
- Specificities were similar across all tested methods at their optimal cut-points.
Conclusions:
- Hydrometers and electronic refractometers are suitable screening tools for assessing bovine colostrum IgG concentration.
- The manufacturer-defined scales for hydrometers may overestimate IgG levels.
- Weight of the first milking is not recommended as a reliable screening method due to its low sensitivity.
Objective:
To determine sensitivity and specificity of 4 methods to assess colostral IgG concentration in dairy cows and determine the optimal cutpoint for each method.
Design:
Cross-sectional study.
Animals:
160 Holstein dairy cows.
Procedures:
171 composite colostrum samples collected within 2 hours after parturition were used in the study. Test methods used to estimate colostral IgG concentration consisted of weight of the first milking, 2 hydrometers, and an electronic refractometer. Results of the test methods were compared with colostral IgG concentration determined by means of radial immunodiffusion. For each method, sensitivity and specificity for detecting colostral IgG concentration < 50 g/L were calculated across a range of potential cutpoints, and the optimal cutpoint for each test was selected to maximize sensitivity and specificity.
Results:
At the optimal cutpoint for each method, sensitivity for weight of the first milking (0.42) was significantly lower than sensitivity for each of the other 3 methods (hydrometer 1, 0.75; hydrometer 2, 0.76; refractometer, 0.75), but no significant differences were identified among the other 3 methods with regard to sensitivity. Specificities at the optimal cutpoint were similar for all 4 methods.
Conclusions And Clinical Relevance:
Results suggested that use of either hydrometer or the electronic refractometer was an acceptable method of screening colostrum for low IgG concentration; however, the manufacturer-defined scale for both hydrometers overestimated colostral IgG concentration. Use of weight of the first milking as a screening test to identify bovine colostrum with inadequate IgG concentration could not be justified because of the low sensitivity.
