Ratio analysis of cumulatives for labeled cell quantification from immunofluorescence histograms derived from cells
1Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi ed Informatica del CNR, Rome, Italy. francesco.lampariello@iasi.cnr.it
Insights
A new, simple method accurately estimates the percentage of labeled cells in immunofluorescence histograms, even with weak labeling and overlapping cell populations. This approach improves upon existing techniques for quantitative analysis.
Area of Science:
- Flow cytometry
- Quantitative cell analysis
- Immunofluorescence techniques
Background:
- Weakly labeled cells in immunofluorescence histograms present analysis challenges due to significant population overlap.
- Manual cell selection is subjective and irreproducible; existing automated methods lack accuracy.
- Accurate quantification of labeled cells is crucial for biological and clinical applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel, user-friendly method for accurately quantifying labeled cell proportions in immunofluorescence histograms.
- To address the limitations of existing methods in analyzing histograms with weak labeling and overlapping cell populations.
- To provide a more accessible and reliable alternative to complex mathematical modeling for cell analysis.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the ratio of cumulative distributions from test and negative control histograms.
- Utilizing a fitting function for a sigma-shaped distribution to estimate labeled cell proportion.
- Employing an iterative procedure for estimate refinement and validation with replicate controls.
Main Results:
- The new method demonstrated excellent agreement with known labeled cell proportions.
- Results were often more accurate than those obtained with previous mathematical modeling approaches.
- The method proved effective across the full range of percentage values and was independent of acquisition precision.
Conclusions:
- The developed method offers an objective, simple, and easily implementable solution for quantitative immunofluorescence histogram analysis.
- It overcomes the inaccuracies associated with manual and basic automated methods for weakly labeled cell populations.
- This technique enhances the reliability and reproducibility of cell proportion estimation in flow cytometry.
Abstract:
The problem of the quantitative analysis of immunofluorescence histograms "with weak labeling" is considered. In these distributions, the fluorescence intensity mean of labeled cells is slightly above that of unlabeled cells, and therefore there is a considerable overlap between the two populations. The procedure of selecting "by eye" an intensity level that separates labeled from unlabeled cells is evidently inadequate, leading to subjective and not reproducible results. Threshold and subtraction methods, although objective, quick, and easy to use, are also inaccurate. Till now, correct enough estimates of the percentage of labeled cells have been obtained only by applying mathematical modeling methods, that are, however, not very easy to handle. A new method for estimating the labeled cell proportion from immunofluorescence histograms is presented. It relies on the analysis of the ratio of the cumulative distributions associated with the routinely available test and negative control histograms. Since this ratio results in a well-defined "sigma-shaped" distribution from a certain channel onwards, a suitable fitting function is used to obtain directly a preliminary estimate of the proportion of labeled cells. Then, an iterative procedure is designed for updating the estimate until it is judged acceptable, according to a suitable criterion. Moreover, to take into account the overall variability in the control data, the estimation process is repeated using the cumulatives associated with replicate negative control histograms. The accuracy of the method was tested with the same set of experimental data analyzed by means of a mathematical modeling method described in a previous article (Lampariello and Aiello, Cytometry 1998;32:241-254). There was a very good agreement between the known and estimated proportions of labeled cells, and the latter were, in many cases, even closer to the true values than those previously obtained. On the basis of the results reported, the method, which is objective, very simple, and much easier to implement than our previously proposed one, appears to be effective in the entire range of the percentage values, and to provide results independent of the acquisition precision.
More Related Videos
09:57Workflow for High-content, Individual Cell Quantification of Fluorescent Markers from Universal Microscope Data, Supported by Open Source Software
Published on: December 16, 2014
08:37In Situ MHC-tetramer Staining and Quantitative Analysis to Determine the Location, Abundance, and Phenotype of Antigen-specific CD8 T Cells in Tissues
Published on: September 22, 2017
