Analytical sensitivity of four HIV combined antigen/antibody assays using the p24 WHO standard

Marcel Miedouge1, Monique Grèze, Agnès Bailly

  • 1Laboratoire de Virologie, Institut Fédératif de Biologie de Purpan, 330 avenue de Grande Bretagne, TSA 40031, 31059 Toulouse, Cédex 9, France. miedouge.m@chu-toulouse.fr

Insights

This study evaluated HIV diagnostic assays using the international IU/ml standard. Four of five assays met the 2 IU/ml limit, showing improved sensitivity for HIV antigen detection.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical diagnostics
  • Virology
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Established Common Technical Specifications for HIV-1 p24 assays in 2009 set the lower limit of detection at 2 IU/ml.
  • Fourth-generation HIV assays detecting both antigen and antibody were primarily evaluated using older pg/ml standards.
  • Performance of combined HIV assays against the current IU/ml standard remains largely unknown.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the performance of four common combined HIV antigen/antibody assays in France.
  • To evaluate these assays against the World Health Organization (WHO) standard in IU/ml.
  • To compare analytical sensitivity of combined assays with the established 2 IU/ml detection limit.

Main Methods:

  • Determined the analytical sensitivity of four combined HIV antigen/antibody assays (ARCHITECT, AxSYM, VIDAS DUO Quick, VIDAS DUO Ultra).
  • Included one p24 assay (VIDAS HIV p24 II) in the analytical sensitivity testing.
  • Utilized serial dilutions of the WHO standard (NIBSC 90/636) for all assay evaluations.

Main Results:

  • Four of the five evaluated assays demonstrated a lower limit of detection below 2 IU/ml.
  • ARCHITECT Combo (1.24 IU/ml), VIDAS DUO Ultra (0.66 IU/ml), VIDAS DUO Quick (0.43 IU/ml), and VIDAS p24 (0.73–1.15 IU/ml) met the criteria.
  • AxSYM assay showed a lower limit of detection close to the 2 IU/ml threshold (1.94–2.25 IU/ml).

Conclusions:

  • This study provides the first data on HIV combined assay sensitivity using the IU/ml WHO standard.
  • Highlights the necessity for a unified international standard for accurate assay comparison.
  • Recommends on-site validation of laboratory methods using this standardized approach.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos