Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2026

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for the Evaluation of Suspected Cardiac Thrombus: Conventional and Emerging Techniques
Published on: June 11, 2019
Intramural blood pools accompanying aortic intramural hematoma: CT appearance and natural course
Ming-Ting Wu1, Yen-Chi Wang, Yi-Luan Huang
1Department of Radiology, Section of Thoracic and Circulation Imaging, Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, No. 386, Ta-Chung 1st Road, Kaohsiung 813, Taiwan. wu.mingting@gmail.com
Insights
Intramural blood pools (IBPs) are common in acute intramural hematoma (IMH) and can appear or resolve over time. These findings on multidetector CT do not indicate a poor prognosis and differ from ulcerlike projections.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Cardiovascular Imaging
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Acute intramural hematoma (IMH) is a serious vascular condition.
- Intramural blood pools (IBPs) are a potential finding within IMH.
- Understanding IBP characteristics is crucial for patient management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate multidetector computed tomographic (CT) imaging for investigating the prevalence, morphology, natural course, and prognostic significance of intramural blood pools (IBPs) in patients with acute intramural hematoma (IMH).
Main Methods:
- Sixty-five patients with acute IMH were enrolled for follow-up using multidetector CT for at least 12 months.
- Logistic regression was used to analyze factors associated with IBP development and resorption.
- Exclusion criteria included patients who underwent surgery.
Main Results:
- Intramural blood pools (IBPs) were observed in 28% of patients, most commonly in the descending thoracic and abdominal aorta.
- New IBPs developed during follow-up in some patients.
- Factors associated with IBP development included younger age and greater IMH wall thickness; incomplete resorption was linked to larger transmural diameter and connection to arteries.
Conclusions:
- Intramural blood pools (IBPs) are frequently detected by multidetector CT in patients with acute intramural hematoma (IMH).
- IBPs can emerge during follow-up or resolve spontaneously.
- The presence of IBPs is not associated with a poor prognosis and should be differentiated from ulcerlike projections.
Purpose:
To evaluate multidetector computed tomographic (CT) images to investigate the prevalence, morphology, natural course, and prognostic effect of intramural blood pools (IBPs) in patients with acute intramural hematoma (IMH).
Materials And Methods:
Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Sixty-five patients (41 men; mean age, 65.9 years ± 11.3 [standard deviation]) with acute IMH undergoing three or more multidetector CT examinations during follow-up for 12 months or longer (median = 18 months), except for those undergoing surgery (n = 16), were enrolled. Associated factors of developing and resorption of IBP in IMH were analyzed by using logistic regression.
Results:
There were 40 IBPs in 10 patients at initial multidetector CT, and 15 new IBPs developed in 11 patients during follow-up. IBPs occurred most in the descending thoracic (55% [31 of 56]) and abdominal (41% [23 of 56]) aorta in 28% (18 of 65) of patients. During 33.8 months (range, 2.8-50 months) of follow-up in these 18 patients, 57% (32 of 56) of IBPs showed complete resorption in 15 patients, 29% (16 of 56) of IBPs showed incomplete resorption in eight patients, and 14% (eight of 56) of IBPs had interrupted follow-up because of surgery or death in three patients. Logistic regression showed that age younger than 70 years (odds ratio [OR], 8.74; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03, 76.9) and IMH wall thickness greater than 10 mm (OR, 4.93; 95% CI: 1.04, 23.0) were associated with developing IBP at initial multidetector CT, while IBP with larger transmural diameter (OR, 1.16; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.31) and multidetector CT-demonstrated connection with intercostal or lumbar artery (63% [35 of 56]) (OR, 5.44; 95% CI: 1.43, 20.9) were associated with incomplete resorption.
Conclusion:
IBPs are frequently observed at multidetector CT in patients with IMH. They may resolve over time or appear during follow-up. These findings are not associated with a poor prognosis, and IBPs should be distinguished from ulcerlike projections.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Hemorrhagic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aneurysm I: Introduction

