Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Comparative Analysis of Human Growth Hormone in Serum Using SPRi, Nano-SPRi and ELISA Assays
Published on: January 7, 2016
Determination of antibodies against human growth hormone using a direct immunoassay format and different
Natalija German1, Asta Kausaite-Minkstimiene, Justina Kirlyte
1Division of Immunotechnology, State Research Institute Centre for Innovative Medicine, Zygimantu 9, LT-01102 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Insights
This study developed a sensitive electrochemical immunosensor for detecting anti-human growth hormone (anti-hGH) antibodies. Pulse amperometry (PA) demonstrated superior sensitivity and a lower limit of detection compared to other electrochemical methods.
Area of Science:
- Electrochemistry
- Biosensors
- Immunotechnology
Background:
- Development of sensitive and accurate methods for detecting specific antibodies is crucial in diagnostics.
- Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) are established techniques for analyzing biomolecular interactions.
- Electrochemical immunosensors offer potential for sensitive and cost-effective analyte detection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the applicability and sensitivity of various electrochemical techniques for developing an accurate immunosensor.
- To detect specific antibodies against human growth hormone (anti-hGH).
- To compare the performance of Pulse Amperometry (PA), Cyclic Voltammetry (CV), Square Wave Voltammetry (SWV), and Differential Pulse Voltammetry (DPV).
Main Methods:
- A direct immunoassay format was employed using human growth hormone (hGH) immobilized on a self-assembled monolayer modified SPR chip.
- Electrochemical techniques including PA, CV, SWV, and DPV were utilized for anti-hGH detection.
- SPR and AFM were used as control methods to confirm antigen-antibody complex formation.
Main Results:
- Pulse Amperometry (PA) and Cyclic Voltammetry (CV) exhibited higher sensitivity compared to SWV and DPV.
- The analytical signal obtained with PA was 2.50 times higher than CV, 16.3 times higher than SWV, and 24.5 times higher than DPV.
- The limit of detection for the PA method was 75 nM, which is lower than the 108 nM limit of detection for the CV method.
Conclusions:
- Pulse Amperometry is the most sensitive electrochemical technique for the developed anti-hGH immunosensor.
- The developed electrochemical immunosensor shows high potential for accurate and sensitive detection of anti-hGH antibodies.
- This approach provides a foundation for advanced electrochemical biosensor development.
Abstract:
A direct immunoassay format with human growth hormone (hGH) immobilized on a self assembled monolayer modified surface plasmon resonance (SPR) chip was chosen to detect specific antibodies (anti-hGH) using different electrochemical techniques. Atomic force microscopy imaging and SPR were used as control methods for the evaluation and confirmation of the antigen-antibody complex formation. The applicability and sensitivity of candidate electrochemical techniques to develop an accurate and sensitive electrochemical immunosensor were investigated. Four electrochemical methods for anti-hGH determination - pulse amperometry (PA), cyclic voltammetry (CV), square wave voltammetry (SWV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), were compared. Higher sensitivity of the developed immunosensor was observed using PA and CV: analytical signal registered using the PA method was 2.50 times higher in comparison with CV, 16.3 times higher in comparison with SWV and 24.5 times higher in comparison with the DPV method. In the case of PA detection method, the limit of detection was lower (75 nM) than that of the CV method (108 nM).

