Quantitative diagnosis of lymphocytic myocarditis in forensic medicine

Trine Skov Nielsen1, Jens Randel Nyengaard2, Jesper Møller3

  • 1Centre for Clinical Research, Vendsyssel Hospital/Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Bispensgade 37, 9800 Hjørring, Denmark; Department of Forensic Medicine, Aarhus University, Brendstrupgaardsvej 100, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.

Insights

This study establishes quantitative diagnostic criteria for lymphocytic myocarditis using stereology on autopsy samples. A cut-off of 11-16 lymphocyte profiles/mm² is suggested for reliable diagnosis, aiding in distinguishing inflamed from non-inflamed myocardium.

Area of Science:

  • Pathology
  • Cardiology
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Lymphocytic myocarditis diagnosis can be challenging, particularly in autopsy samples.
  • Current diagnostic criteria may lack quantitative precision for subtle inflammatory changes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To establish quantitative diagnostic criteria for lymphocytic myocarditis in autopsy specimens.
  • To determine a reliable cut-off value for lymphocyte cell profile counts in myocardial tissue.

Main Methods:

  • Stereological cell profile counting was used to quantify lymphocytes and macrophages.
  • Myocardial autopsy specimens from 112 myocarditis cases and 86 controls were analyzed.
  • Sensitivity and specificity were calculated to determine the optimal diagnostic cut-off.

Main Results:

  • The mean lymphocyte count was significantly higher in the myocarditis group (52.7/mm²) compared to controls (9.7/mm²).
  • A cut-off of 13 lymphocyte profiles/mm² achieved the highest sensitivity (68%) and specificity (83%).
  • A suggested range of 11-16 lymphocyte profiles/mm² is proposed for reliable diagnosis, though low counts present challenges.

Conclusions:

  • Quantitative stereological analysis provides valuable data for diagnosing lymphocytic myocarditis.
  • A cut-off value between 11-16 lymphocyte profiles/mm² is recommended for autopsy samples.
  • A multidisciplinary approach is advised for evaluating subtle inflammatory changes, with histology as a primary tool.