Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 28, 2026
Application of a New Mesh Fixation Method in Laparoscopic Incisional Hernia Repair
Published on: December 23, 2022
The Comparison of Inflammatory Responses and Clinical Results After Groin Hernia Repair Using Polypropylene or
N Bulbuller1, C Kirkil2, A Godekmerdan3
1Department of Surgery, Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.
Insights
This study found that both polypropylene and polyester meshes show similar inflammatory responses and clinical outcomes in groin hernia repair. Patients receiving mesh repair experienced less pain and faster recovery compared to the Shouldice herniorrhaphy group.
Area of Science:
- Surgical innovation
- Biomaterials science
- Inflammatory response
Background:
- Groin hernia repair commonly utilizes synthetic meshes.
- Understanding the inflammatory response and clinical outcomes of different mesh materials is crucial for patient recovery.
- Polypropylene and polyester meshes are widely used prostheses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical results and inflammatory markers (IL-6, CRP) between polypropylene and polyester meshes in groin hernia repair.
- To evaluate postoperative pain and recovery time in patients undergoing different hernia repair techniques.
- To assess the inflammatory impact of mesh implantation versus non-mesh repair.
Main Methods:
- Ninety patients with unilateral inguinal hernia were randomized to Shouldice herniorrhaphy or Lichtenstein hernioplasty with polypropylene or polyester mesh.
- Serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured.
- Postoperative pain, chronic pain, and time to return to normal activities were assessed.
Main Results:
- Both polypropylene and polyester meshes elicited similar inflammatory responses, with elevated CRP levels at 48 hours post-surgery.
- Patients undergoing mesh repair (polypropylene or polyester) reported less acute postoperative pain and quicker recovery than those with Shouldice herniorrhaphy.
- IL-6 levels returned to baseline by 48 hours in all groups; CRP normalized in the Shouldice group but remained elevated in mesh groups.
Conclusions:
- Polypropylene and polyester meshes demonstrate comparable inflammatory profiles and clinical efficacy in groin hernia repair.
- Mesh-augmented hernia repair leads to improved clinical outcomes, including reduced pain and faster recovery, compared to non-mesh techniques.
- The choice between polypropylene and polyester mesh does not significantly alter inflammatory response or clinical results in this patient cohort.
Abstract:
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results and the inflammatory responses against polypropylene and polyester meshes after groin hernia repair. Ninety patients with unilateral inguinal hernia randomly underwent Shouldice herniorrhaphy or Lichtenstein hernioplasty using polypropylene or polyester meshes. Venous blood samples were collected to evaluate serum interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Postoperative acute and chronic pain and time to attain to normal activities were evaluated. IL-6 levels decreased to preoperative levels in all groups at 48th hour. CRP levels of mesh-implanted groups are significantly higher than preoperative level at 48th hour, while it reduced to preoperative level in Shouldice herniorrhaphy group. Patients treated with mesh repair had less postoperative acute pain and recovered more rapidly than those who underwent Shouldice herniorrhaphy. It was concluded that polypropylene and polyester meshes used in hernia repair caused similar inflammatory responses and that clinical results after groin hernia repair with these prostheses were not significantly different.
