Analytical verification and method comparison of the ADVIA Centaur® Intact Parathyroid Hormone assay

Esther Fernández-Galán1, Josep Lluís Bedini1, Xavier Filella1

  • 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics & Core Lab (CDB), Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.

Clinical Biochemistry
|September 16, 2017
PubMed

Insights

The new Siemens ADVIA Centaur® Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTHm) assay shows excellent analytical performance and clinical agreement with the older iPTH assay. This validated iPTHm assay is suitable for replacing the existing method, ensuring reliable parathyroid hormone measurements.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Immunoassay Development
  • Endocrinology

Background:

  • Intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) levels are crucial for diagnosing and managing mineral and bone disorders.
  • Existing iPTH assays may have limitations, necessitating the development and validation of novel methods.
  • The Siemens ADVIA Centaur® platform is widely used for various immunoassays.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To verify the analytical performance of the novel iPTH Siemens ADVIA Centaur® Intact Parathyroid Hormone (iPTHm) chemiluminescence immunoassay.
  • To compare iPTH results from the iPTHm assay with the previous ADVIA Centaur® Parathyroid Hormone assay (iPTHp).
  • To assess the clinical concordance and sample stability of the iPTHm assay.

Main Methods:

  • Analytical performance was evaluated, including limit of detection (LoD), limit of quantitation (LoQ), reproducibility, and linearity.
  • A comparative study involved 369 routine plasma samples, analyzed across different glomerular filtration rate (GFR) categories and in hemodialysis patients.
  • Clinical concordance was assessed using the Kappa Index, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) stability was studied at 4°C.

Main Results:

  • The iPTHm assay demonstrated LoD of 0.03 pmol/L and LoQ of 0.10 pmol/L, with intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) between 2.3% and 6.2%.
  • Excellent correlation (r=0.99) and low bias (-2.55%) were observed between iPTHm and iPTHp assays.
  • High clinical concordance (Kappa Index = 0.874) was achieved, and PTH stability was confirmed for up to 14 days at 4°C.

Conclusions:

  • The novel iPTHm assay exhibits acceptable analytical performance and strong clinical agreement with the established iPTHp assay.
  • The iPTHm assay is a reliable replacement for the iPTHp assay in the laboratory setting.
  • Plasma sample stability for PTH measurements is maintained for at least 14 days at 4°C using the iPTHm assay.
Abstract