Platelet storage lesion in interim platelet unit concentrates: A comparison with buffy-coat and apheresis

Sukhi Singh1, Caroline Shams Hakimi1, Anders Jeppsson2

  • 1Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Insights

The study compared interim platelet units (IPU) to buffy-coat and apheresis platelet concentrates, finding IPU quality comparable to buffy-coat preparations. IPU showed better metabolic parameter maintenance and aggregability later in storage.

Area of Science:

  • Transfusion Medicine
  • Hematology
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Platelet storage lesion (PSL) impacts platelet function and morphology.
  • Collection methods and storage media influence PSL severity.
  • Comparing novel interim platelet units (IPU) with established preparations is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare PSL in interim platelet units (IPU) versus buffy-coat PCs and apheresis PCs.
  • To evaluate the impact of storage on metabolic parameters, activation markers, and aggregability.
  • To assess the quality of IPU PCs in additive solution SSP+.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed 30 PCs (10 each: IPU, buffy-coat, apheresis) over 7 days.
  • Measured lactate, glucose, and pH.
  • Quantified CD62p, CD63, phosphatidylserine expression via flow cytometry and aggregability via aggregometry.

Main Results:

  • IPU showed higher initial activation and lower aggregability than buffy-coat PCs on day 1.
  • IPU maintained metabolic parameters, activation markers, and aggregability better than buffy-coat PCs by day 7.
  • IPU PCs exhibited higher activation markers and lower aggregability than apheresis PCs throughout storage.

Conclusions:

  • Significant differences in PSL exist among IPU, buffy-coat, and apheresis PCs.
  • IPU PC quality is comparable to buffy-coat preparations.
  • Further research needed to differentiate preparation method effects from storage conditions.