Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Assessment of Lymphocyte Migration in an Ex Vivo Transmigration System
Published on: September 20, 2019
Commutability assessment of reference materials for the enumeration of lymphocyte subsets
Chenbin Li1, Mingting Peng1, Dongsheng Xu2
1National Center for Clinical Laboratories, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology and Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China.
Insights
Commutability assessment of reference materials for lymphocyte subsets is vital for accurate immune status monitoring. This study found that different assessment approaches yielded varying results, recommending the difference in bias method.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Biotechnology
Background:
- Accurate enumeration of lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood is essential for assessing immune status.
- Commutable reference materials (RM) are critical for ensuring consistent and reliable measurement results across different laboratories and over time.
- The commutability of RMs for lymphocyte subset enumeration has not been previously reported.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the commutability of reference materials for lymphocyte subset enumeration.
- To compare different approaches for evaluating the commutability of RMs.
- To establish prerequisites for commutability assessment, including RM suitability and measuring system comparability.
Main Methods:
- Lymphocyte subsets were quantified in patient samples and RMs using two common flow cytometry systems (FACS Canto II and Cytomics FC500).
- Suitability of RMs and comparability of the measuring systems were evaluated first.
- Commutability was assessed using both regression and difference in bias approaches.
Main Results:
- Two RMs were not measurable on the FC500 system for specific lymphocyte subsets.
- The two measuring systems demonstrated comparable performance with patient samples.
- Varying numbers of RMs were found to be commutable depending on the specific lymphocyte subset and the assessment approach used.
- Discrepancies were observed between the regression and difference in bias approaches for certain lymphocyte subsets.
Conclusions:
- RM suitability and measuring system comparability are necessary prerequisites for commutability assessment.
- Different commutability assessment approaches can lead to divergent conclusions.
- The difference in bias approach is recommended for commutability assessment, aligning with medical requirements and system performance characteristics.
Abstract:
Background Flow cytometric enumeration of lymphocyte subsets in peripheral blood can provide important information about immune status. Commutable reference materials (RM) are crucial for maintaining accurate and comparable measurement results over time and space. Commutability assessment of RMs for lymphocyte subsets enumeration has not been reported elsewhere. Methods Lymphocyte subsets were measured in triplicate on 56 patient samples and eight RMs using two measuring systems commonly used in laboratories (FACS Canto II and Cytomics FC500). The first step was to determine the suitability of RMs and comparability of different systems with patient samples. After the requirements of suitability and comparability were met, the second step was to assess commutability following regression approach and difference in bias approach. Results Two RMs were not measurable on FC500 system for CD3-CD16/56+ and CD3-CD19+ percentages. The results of comparability showed no significant difference in the two systems. Eight RMs for CD3+CD4+ cell count, six RMs for CD3+ and CD3+CD8+ percentages, five RMs for CD3-CD16/56+ percentage, and three RMs for CD3-CD19+ percentage were commutable using the two approaches. For CD3+, CD3+CD8+ and CD3-CD19+ percentages, the results of regression approach showed that one RM was non-commutable for each parameter, while the other approach showed that the RM was commutable. Conclusions The suitability of RM and comparability of different measuring systems are prerequisites for assessing commutability. This study indicated that different approaches led to different results. The difference in bias approach is recommended for criteria relating to medical requirements and performance characteristics of measuring systems in use.
More Related Videos
09:20Intracellular Staining and Flow Cytometry to Identify Lymphocyte Subsets within Murine Aorta, Kidney and Lymph Nodes in a Model of Hypertension
Published on: January 28, 2017
09:02Immunoglobulin Gene Sequence Analysis In Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: From Patient Material To Sequence Interpretation
Published on: November 26, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Inertial Frames of Reference
Non-inertial Frames of Reference
Chemical Shift: Internal References and Solvent Effects
The internal reference compound generally used in NMR spectroscopy is tetramethylsilane (TMS). TMS is preferred because it is chemically inert, soluble in NMR solvents, and easily removable. Also, the highly shielded methyl protons in TMS yield an intense...
Members Made of Elastoplastic Material
As the bending moment...
Genetic Material
Bending of Members Made of Several Materials
Hooke's Law determines stress in each material, stating that stress is proportional to strain but varies due to each material's...