Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 22, 2026

Multiplexed Fluorescent Immunohistochemical Staining, Imaging, and Analysis in Histological Samples of Lymphoma
Published on: January 9, 2019
A validation study of whole slide imaging for primary diagnosis of lymphoma
Saiful Amin1, Taro Mori1, Tomoo Itoh1
1Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Insights
Whole slide imaging (WSI) accurately diagnoses lymphoma, even with complex staining. This study confirms WSI
Area of Science:
- Digital pathology
- Hematopathology
- Oncology
Background:
- Whole slide imaging (WSI) adoption is growing globally.
- Previous WSI validation often excluded complex cases like lymphoma requiring special stains.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic accuracy of WSI for lymphoma cases.
- To evaluate WSI performance on H&E, immunohistochemical, and special stains.
Main Methods:
- Digitization of 240 lymphoma biopsies and resections using WSI.
- Pathologist diagnosis via WSI compared to light microscopy.
- Classification of discrepancies into concordance, minor, and major categories.
Main Results:
- High overall concordance (92.92%) between WSI and light microscopy diagnoses.
- Low rates of minor (6.25%) and major (0.83%) discrepancies.
- WSI demonstrated high accuracy for lymphoma diagnosis.
Conclusions:
- Whole slide imaging is a reliable technology for lymphoma diagnosis.
- WSI can be effectively used for complex hematopathological specimens.
- Further validation supports WSI integration into routine pathology workflows.
Abstract:
Whole slide imaging (WSI) is being increasingly used worldwide. Although previous studies have asserted the validity of WSI diagnosis, they have primarily targeted only small specimens and excluded cases requiring immunohistochemistry or special staining, such as lymphoma. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of WSI diagnosis of lymphoma, for which 240 biopsies and resections of lymphoma cases were selected from the study set of lymphomas. All slides including H&E, immunohistochemical and special staining were digitized using a WSI image scanner. An experienced pathologist performed the WSI diagnoses, which were compared with original diagnoses based on light microscopic examinations. Discrepancy between the two interpretations were classified into three categories: concordance, minor discrepancy (no clinical significance), and major discrepancy (with clinical significance). Overall concordance between the light microscopic and WSI diagnosis was found in 223 cases (92.92%; 95%CI = 88.90-95.82), minor discrepancy in fifteen (6.25%; 95%CI = 3.54-10.10), and major discrepancy in two (0.83%; 95%CI = 0.10-2.98). Diagnosis of lymphoma using WSI appeared to be mostly accurate, suggesting that WSI may be a reliable technology for the diagnosis of lymphoma.
Related Concept Videos
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis I
There are thirteen domains...
Formulating and Validating Nursing Diagnosis II
Risk nursing diagnoses represent clinical judgments of an individual, family, or community more vulnerable to developing the health problem than others...
Reliability and Validity
Design Example: Designing Water Slide
Bernoulli's principle determines the water's velocity along the slide....
Nursing Diagnosis
The nursing diagnosis focuses on evidence-based...
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...

