Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Histological-Based Stainings Using Free-Floating Tissue Sections
Published on: August 25, 2020
The utilization and utility of immunostains in body fluid cytology
Safa Alshaikh1, Razvan Lapadat2, Mohammed K Atieh2
1Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, Bahrain.
Insights
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) aids body fluid cytology (BFC) diagnosis. This study found that higher IHC use rates in BFC did not improve diagnostic accuracy, suggesting the laboratory
Area of Science:
- Cytopathology
- Oncology
- Immunohistochemistry
Background:
- Body fluid cytology (BFC) is crucial for diagnosing and staging malignancy.
- Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an important adjunct in BFC analysis.
- Optimal utilization of IHC in BFC requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the usage rates, types, and indications of IHC stains in BFC.
- To assess the diagnostic impact of IHC in BFC.
- To estimate the optimal IHC usage rate in BFC.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of IHC stain use in BFC over a 5.5-year period (2013-2018).
- Analysis of laboratory and individual cytopathologist IHC usage patterns.
- Correlation of IHC use rates with indeterminate and malignant diagnosis rates.
Main Results:
- 11.5% of BFC cases (477/4144) utilized 2128 IHC stains (average 4.5 per case).
- Individual cytopathologist IHC use ranged from 6.7% to 22%.
- Higher IHC use correlated with less experience and increased indeterminate diagnoses, not malignant ones. Common indications included differentiating mesothelial from malignant cells.
Conclusions:
- The laboratory's average IHC use rate may represent an optimal benchmark.
- Increased IHC utilization in BFC did not enhance diagnostic certainty or malignancy detection.
- Judicious application of IHC is recommended in BFC.
Background:
Body fluid cytology (BFC) is an important tool in the diagnosis and staging of malignancy and is aided by the judicious use of immunohistochemistry (IHC). The aim of this study was to determine the usage rates of IHC stains in BFC, their type and indications, and their diagnostic impact. We also attempted to estimate the optimal rate of IHC use in BFC by comparing the entire laboratory's and each individual cytopathologist's IHC use rates with their respective indeterminate and malignant diagnosis rates.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective study of IHC stain use in BFC during a 5.5-year interval (2013-2018) and determined the laboratory's and each individual cytopathologist's IHC usage patterns according to the final diagnosis, site, and indications for their use.
Results:
A total of 477 out of 4144 (11.5%) BFC cases had 2128 individual immunostains performed, with an average of 4.5 immunostains per case. Individual cytopathologists used IHC stains on 6.7% to 22% of their BFC cases. Pathologists with higher rates of IHC stain use than the laboratory's mean were less experienced and had higher rates of indeterminate but not of malignant diagnoses. The most common indication for the use of IHC stains was differentiating mesothelial from malignant cells. MOC31, calretinin, Ber-EP4, CD68, and D2-40 were the most commonly used of the 67 different IHC stains used in BFC.
Conclusions:
The laboratory's mean may represent the optimal IHC use rate, as higher IHC use rates did not lead to more diagnostic certainty or higher pickup rates of malignant cells.
Related Concept Videos
Immunocytochemistry and Immunohistochemistry
These...
Immunofluorescence Microscopy
Flow Cytometry
In...

