Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 25, 2025

Anti-Nuclear Antibody Screening Using HEp-2 Cells
Published on: June 23, 2014
Evaluation of a Fully Automated Antinuclear Antibody Indirect Immunofluorescence Assay in Routine Use
Hyun-Woo Choi1, Yong Jun Kwon2, Ju-Heon Park3
1Department of Laboratory Medicine, Chonnam National University Bitgoeul Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea.
Insights
The Helios automated system shows good agreement for detecting antinuclear antibodies (ANA) via indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), significantly reducing testing time and costs. However, human validation is still needed for accurate pattern recognition and endpoint titers.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Laboratory Science
- Immunology
- Automation in Diagnostics
Background:
- Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using HEp-2 cells is the standard for antinuclear antibody (ANA) detection.
- Current ANA IFA methods are labor-intensive and lack standardization, prompting the need for automation.
- Automation aims to improve efficiency, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness in clinical laboratories.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the analytical performance of the automated Helios ANA IFA analyzer in a clinical setting.
- To compare the time and cost of ANA IFA testing before and after implementing the Helios system.
- To assess the concordance of Helios results with traditional visual readings for ANA detection.
Main Methods:
- A total of 3,276 serum samples were analyzed for ANA using the Helios system.
- Results (positive/negative, patterns, titers) were compared between automated Helios readings and manual visual readings.
- Turnaround time and the number of wells used per test were compared pre- and post-Helios implementation.
Main Results:
- The Helios system demonstrated high concordance with visual readings for positive/negative results (93.4%, κ = 0.80) and specificity (99.4%).
- Agreement for pattern recognition was 70.1% for single and 72.4% for mixed patterns; endpoint titer agreement was 75.9%.
- Helios significantly reduced median turnaround time (100.6 to 55.7 hours) and the average wells used per test (4 to 1.5).
Conclusions:
- The Helios automated ANA IFA analyzer offers significant labor, time, and cost savings in routine laboratory workflows.
- While effective for positive/negative discrimination, the system requires human observer validation for complex patterns and precise titration.
- Software மேம்பாடுகள் are needed for full integration of automated ANA IFA analyzers into routine clinical diagnostics.
Abstract:
Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using HEp-2 cells as a substrate is the gold standard for detecting antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in patient serum. However, the ANA IFA has labor-intensive nature of the procedure and lacks adequate standardization. To overcome these drawbacks, the automation has been developed and implemented to the clinical laboratory. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the analytical performance of a fully automated Helios ANA IFA analyzer in a real-life laboratory setting, and to compare the time and the cost of ANA IFA testing before and after adopting the Helios system. A total of 3,276 consecutive serum samples were analyzed for ANA using the Helios system from May to August 2019. The positive/negative results, staining patterns, and endpoint titers were compared between Helios and visual readings. Furthermore, the turnaround time and the number of wells used were compared before and after the introduction of Helios system. Of the 3,276 samples tested, 748 were positive and 2,528 were negative based on visual readings. Using visual reading as the reference standard, the overall relative sensitivity, relative specificity, and concordance of Helios reading were 73.3, 99.4, and 93.4% (κ = 0.80), respectively. For pattern recognition, the overall agreement was 70.1% (298/425) for single patterns, and 72.4% (89/123) for mixed patterns. For titration, there was an agreement of 75.9% (211/278) between automated and classical endpoint titers by regarding within ± one titer difference as acceptable. Helios significantly shortened the median turnaround time from 100.6 to 55.7 h (P < 0.0001). Furthermore, routine use of the system reduced the average number of wells used per test from 4 to 1.5. Helios shows good agreement in distinguishing between positive and negative results. However, it still has limitations in positive/negative discrimination, pattern recognition, and endpoint titer prediction, requiring additional validation of results by human observers. Helios provides significant advantages in routine laboratory ANA IFA work in terms of labor, time, and cost savings. We hope that upgrading and developing softwares with more reliable capabilities will allow automated ANA IFA analyzers to be fully integrated into the routine operations of the clinical laboratory.
More Related Videos
10:05Simultaneous Distinction of Monospecific and Mixed DFS70 Patterns During ANA Screening with a Novel HEp-2 ELITE/DFS70 Knockout Substrate
Published on: January 17, 2018
07:52Detection of Antibodies That Neutralize the Cellular Uptake of Enzyme Replacement Therapies with a Cell-based Assay
Published on: September 10, 2018