Comprehensive comparison of upper and lower endoscopic small intestinal biopsy in cats with chronic enteropathy

Betty Chow1,2, Steve L Hill1,3, Keith P Richter1

  • 1Veterinary Specialty Hospital by Ethos Veterinary Health, San Diego, California, USA.

Insights

Integrating immunohistochemistry (IHC) and clonality testing with histopathology improves feline lymphoma diagnosis. This study found that these methods significantly increased lymphoma diagnoses compared to histopathology alone, though lower small intestine samples were less informative.

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary Pathology
  • Oncology
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Differentiating feline inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from alimentary small cell lymphoma (LSA) is challenging.
  • Histopathology alone has limitations in definitively diagnosing these conditions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the combined utility of histopathology, immunohistochemistry (IHC), and clonality testing for diagnosing feline IBD and LSA.
  • To evaluate diagnostic agreement between upper (USI) and lower small intestine (LSI) endoscopic biopsy samples.

Main Methods:

  • Histopathology, IHC, and clonality testing were applied to biopsy samples from 57 cats with suspected IBD or LSA.
  • Cases were initially classified by histopathology, then re-evaluated after integrating IHC and clonality results.
  • Diagnostic agreement between USI and LSI samples was analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Histopathology alone diagnosed 42.1% as IBD and 31.6% as LSA.
  • Integrating IHC and clonality testing reclassified significant numbers of cases, increasing the final LSA diagnosis rate to 77.2%.
  • Moderate agreement (κ = 0.66–0.70) was observed between USI and LSI samples, with LSI rarely providing a definitive LSA diagnosis alone.

Conclusions:

  • Combined IHC and clonality testing enhance the diagnosis of feline alimentary small cell lymphoma.
  • While diagnostic agreement between upper and lower small intestine samples is moderate, lower small intestine biopsies are less likely to yield a definitive diagnosis.
  • The clinical impact of these diagnostic improvements on patient outcomes requires further investigation.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos