Comparison of tests for failure of passive transfer in neonatal calf serum using total protein refractometry and the

Katharine Denholm1, Alexandra Haggerty1, Colin Mason2

  • 1Scottish Centre for Production Animal Health and Food Safety, University of Glasgow School of Veterinary Medicine, 464 Bearsden Road, Bearsden, Glasgow, G61 1QH, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Insights

The biuret method is more accurate than refractometry for detecting failure of passive transfer (FPT) in calves, despite refractometry

Area of Science:

  • Veterinary Medicine
  • Neonatal Calf Health
  • Immunology

Background:

  • Failure of passive transfer (FPT) in neonatal calves is a critical health issue.
  • Colostral antibody absorption is essential for calf immunity.
  • Serum Immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration above 10 g/L is the standard for adequate transfer.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare total protein (TP) measurements by refractometry and biuret methods against radial immunodiffusion (RID) for FPT detection in dairy calves.
  • To assess the agreement between refractometry and biuret methods for estimating TP.

Main Methods:

  • Neonatal dairy calves were used as the study population.
  • Serum samples were analyzed using radial immunodiffusion (RID) as the reference test.
  • Total protein (TP) was measured indirectly using both refractometry and biuret methods.

Main Results:

  • Neither biuret nor refractometer methods showed high sensitivity for FPT detection compared to RID.
  • The biuret method demonstrated higher accuracy (83.1%) and specificity (93.9%) than refractometry (69.3% accuracy, 74.4% specificity).
  • Refractometry was more prone to overestimating FPT cases, with lower mean TP estimation than the biuret method.

Conclusions:

  • The biuret method is preferable to refractometry for diagnosing FPT in calves due to its superior accuracy and specificity.
  • While refractometry is convenient, its lower accuracy may lead to misdiagnosis of FPT in neonatal dairy calves.

Related Concept Videos