Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 2, 2025

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
Diagnostic value of implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations
Nikola N Radovanović1, Siniša U Pavlović1,2, Bratislav Kirćanski1,2
1Pacemaker Center, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.
Insights
The implantable loop recorder (ILR) diagnosed cardiac arrhythmias in 54.1% of patients with unexplained syncope or palpitations. For recurrent palpitations, ILR diagnostic value was lower, suggesting earlier implantation in syncope evaluations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Diagnostic Technology
Background:
- The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a compact cardiac rhythm-monitoring device.
- Unexplained syncope, presyncope, and palpitations can indicate cardiac arrhythmias.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the diagnostic utility of the implantable loop recorder (ILR).
- To evaluate ILR effectiveness in patients experiencing unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggestive of cardiac arrhythmias.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, observational, single-center study.
- 181 patients received an ILR between January 2006 and July 2019.
- Diagnostic value was determined by whether the ILR led to a diagnosis or verified/excluded arrhythmia as the cause of symptoms.
Main Results:
- The implantable loop recorder (ILR) was diagnostic in 54.1% of patients (98 out of 181).
- The mean follow-up was 20.2 months, with a mean time to a diagnostic event of 11.1 months.
- No significant difference in ILR diagnostic value was observed based on baseline patient characteristics or prior diagnostic procedures.
Conclusions:
- The implantable loop recorder (ILR) achieved an etiological diagnosis in 54.1% of patients with unexplained symptoms suggestive of cardiac arrhythmias.
- ILR demonstrated significantly lower diagnostic value in patients with recurrent palpitations compared to those with syncope or presyncope.
- The study recommends earlier implantation of ILR in the syncope evaluation process.
Background:
The implantable loop recorder (ILR) is a small cardiac rhythm-monitoring device. Our aim was to determine ILR diagnostic value in patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias.
Methods:
This has been a retrospective, observational, single-center study. We included 181 patients in whom ILR was implanted at the Clinical Center of Serbia between January 2006 and July 2019. An event was marked as diagnostic if it led to a diagnosis and ILR was considered diagnostic if it verified or excluded an arrhythmia as the cause of syncope or palpitations.
Results:
The mean age was 51.8 ± 17.8 years and 94 (51.9%) were male. The mean follow-up period was 20.2 ± 15.8 months. ILR was diagnostic in 98 patients (54.1%). There was no significant difference in diagnostic value of ILR in regard to the baseline patients' characteristics. The mean time to occurrence of the diagnostic event was 11.1 ± 9.6 months. The time to occurrence of a diagnostic event did not differ significantly between patients who underwent basic as compared to extended diagnostics before ILR implantation.
Conclusions:
ILR was able to achieve an etiological diagnosis in 54.1% of patients with unexplained syncope, presyncope, or palpitations suggesting cardiac arrhythmias. In a subgroup of patients with recurrent palpitations, ILR was significantly less diagnostic than in patients with syncope or presyncope. ILR should be implanted beforehand in syncope evaluation process.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Dysrhythmias V: Evaluating Dysrhythmias
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
Electrocardiogram
Three major waveforms are present in a typical ECG recording: the P wave, the QRS complex, and...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation

