Sequential Application of Lugol's Iodine Test after Acetic Acid for Detecting Cervical Dysplasia: A Prospective

Günther A Rezniczek1, Samira Ertan1, Sadia Rehman1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 44625 Herne, Germany.

Insights

Lugol's iodine test for cervical lesions shows moderate sensitivity and poor specificity in detecting low-grade/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL/HSIL). However, it influenced clinical management in 5.3% of cases when used with acetic acid during colposcopy.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecology
  • Oncology
  • Pathology

Background:

  • Cervical cancer screening relies on identifying squamous intraepithelial lesions.
  • Lugol's iodine staining is a standard colposcopic adjunct for lesion detection.
  • Standardized protocols are crucial for evaluating diagnostic test performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the diagnostic performance of Lugol's iodine test in detecting LSIL/HSIL during colposcopy.
  • To evaluate secondary parameters including lesion appearance time, staining intensity, and fading.
  • To determine the impact of Lugol's iodine on clinical management decisions.

Main Methods:

  • A prospective cohort study involving 320 women undergoing colposcopy.
  • Standardized protocol: 5% acetic acid followed by 5% Lugol's iodine.
  • Recording of most severe acetowhite lesions (MSAWL) and iodine-negative lesions (MSINL).
  • Primary endpoint: sensitivity and specificity of MSINL for LSIL/HSIL detection.

Main Results:

  • MSINL demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.4% and specificity of 29.5% for LSIL/HSIL detection.
  • Lugol's iodine exclusively identified 96 MSINLs, with 1.9 needed to biopsy for one additional LSIL/HSIL.
  • Clinical management was altered in 5.3% of patients based on Lugol's iodine results.
  • MSINL appeared instantly (within 10s) and staining intensity correlated with lesion severity.

Conclusions:

  • Lugol's iodine test, when used with acetic acid, offers moderate sensitivity but poor specificity for LSIL/HSIL.
  • The test can influence clinical management in a small percentage of cases.
  • Instantaneous staining and correlation with lesion severity are notable characteristics.