Comparison of Whole Blood Cryopreservation Methods for Extensive Flow Cytometry Immunophenotyping

Valentina Serra1, Valeria Orrù1, Sandra Lai1

  • 1Institute for Genetic and Biomedical Research, National Research Council (CNR), Cittadella Universitaria di Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy.

Cells
|May 14, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Cryopreservation of blood samples is crucial for large studies. Dimethyl sulfoxide-based methods best preserve immune cell populations for flow cytometry analysis, closely matching fresh blood results.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • Flow cytometry is essential for studying the human immune system.
  • Maintaining sample quality during large-scale, multicenter studies is challenging.
  • Effective cryopreservation of whole blood is vital for reliable immunophenotyping.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare immunophenotypic data quality from fresh blood versus five cryopreservation methods.
  • To evaluate the impact of cryopreservation on 41 distinct immune cell populations.

Main Methods:

  • Blood samples were cryopreserved using three fixative-based and two dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-based methods.
  • Immunophenotyping was performed using flow cytometry to quantify 41 immune cell populations.
  • Data from cryopreserved samples were compared to fresh blood controls.

Main Results:

  • Fixative-based methods compromised the detection of critical B and T cell markers (e.g., CD27, CXCR3, CCR6).
  • DMSO-based methods allowed reliable discrimination of most immune cell populations post-thaw.
  • One DMSO-based method, using media with DMSO, yielded results most similar to fresh blood.

Conclusions:

  • Cryopreservation significantly impacts immunophenotyping data quality.
  • DMSO-based cryopreservation is superior to fixative-based methods for preserving immune cell populations.
  • Specific DMSO-containing media offer the most reliable approach for long-term storage of blood for flow cytometry analysis.