Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 2, 2025

A High-Throughput Multiplexed Screening for Type 1 Diabetes, Celiac Diseases, and COVID-19
Published on: July 5, 2022
Assessing the allogenic realness of the Cw1/12/15 pattern occurring in the LABScreen single antigen assay
Magali Devriese1,2, Cédric Usureau1,2, Julien Lion1,2
1Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France.
Insights
The Cw1/12/15 reactivity pattern in Luminex single antigen (LSA) assays is a false positive. This pattern, observed with the LABScreen assay, does not correlate with actual HLA antigen presence or transplant outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Immunology
- Transplantation Immunology
- Clinical Chemistry
Background:
- Technical limitations of Luminex single antigen (LSA) assays are known.
- A specific reactivity pattern against Cw1/12/15 antigens has been observed, unexplained by current epitope databases.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the nature of the Cw1/12/15 reactivity pattern observed in Luminex LABScreen assays.
- To determine if this pattern represents a true or false positive result in HLA typing.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 33 patient sera exhibiting the Cw1/12/15 pattern using Luminex LABScreen and Lifecodes LSA.
- Investigation of bead reactivity after acid denaturation.
- Serum adsorption studies using spleen mononuclear cells and single HLA transfected cell clones.
Main Results:
- The Cw1/12/15 pattern showed increased MFI after acid denaturation on LABScreen beads.
- All tested sera were negative for these Cw beads using Lifecodes LSA.
- No significant MFI difference was found after serum adsorption on different cell types.
Conclusions:
- The Cw1/12/15 reactivity pattern on the Luminex LABScreen assay is a false positive.
- This finding highlights potential assay-specific interferences and the need for careful interpretation of HLA typing results.
Abstract:
Several technical limitations of Luminex single antigen (LSA) assays have been described so far. This study focused on a reactivity pattern observed in many sera that cannot be explained by eplets described in the Epitope Registry database and sometimes appearing against a self-HLA allele or antigen. In most cases, this pattern is revealed by a discrepant result when compared with other assays (Luminex PRA, cell-binding assays such as flow cytometry cross match, LSA from another manufacturer…). We focus here on the Cw1/12/15 pattern appearing on the LABScreen class I LSA provided by One Lambda. We documented its behavior using this LSA after acid denaturation of the beads, using Lifecodes LSA from Immucor, and adsorption of sera either on spleen mononuclear cells from deceased donors or on single HLA transfected cell clones. We studied 33 sera from different patients positive for the three Cw beads, selected from our routine patients' LSA database. Nine patients had transplants from a Cw12 or Cw15 donor without any pejorative evolution of the graft, nor post-transplant MFI (mean fluorescence intensity) increase of the Cw1/12/15 beads. A significant increase of MFI was observed after acid denaturation of the LABScreen beads. All sera tested by Lifecodes LSA were negative for these Cw beads. Finally, we found no significant difference of MFI after adsorption on cells from either origin. Therefore, the Cw1/12/15 pattern appears to be a false positive reactivity of the LABScreen single antigen assay.
More Related Videos
06:50A High-Throughput Electrochemiluminescence 7-Plex Assay Simultaneously Screening for Type 1 Diabetes and Multiple Autoimmune Diseases
Published on: May 29, 2020
06:03Author Spotlight: Advancing Immune Monitoring in Critical Care Patients Using Whole Blood Assays
Published on: September 20, 2024