Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Separation of Immune Cell Subpopulations in Peripheral Blood Samples from Children with Infectious Mononucleosis
Published on: September 7, 2022
Automated microarray platform for single-cell sorting and collection of lymphocytes following HIV reactivation
Belén Cortés-Llanos1,2, Vaibhav Jain3, Alicia Cooper-Volkheimer2
1Department of Bioengineering University of Washington Washington USA.
Insights
Understanding HIV reactivation is key to a cure. New methods reveal single T-cells respond differently to latency reversing agents, showing varied reactivation kinetics and gene expression crucial for eliminating the virus.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Immunology
- Cell Biology
Background:
- HIV cure strategies involve reactivating latent viruses using latency reversing agents (LRAs) and eliminating infected cells.
- Incomplete and heterogeneous viral reactivation limits the effectiveness of HIV eradication strategies.
- Understanding the mechanisms of HIV reactivation at the single-cell level is critical for therapeutic success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and utilize methodologies for temporal tracking and molecular analysis of single HIV-infected cells during viral reactivation.
- To investigate the heterogeneity of HIV reactivation kinetics in T-lymphocytes in response to different LRAs.
Main Methods:
- Microraft arrays were used to image T-lymphocytes engineered to express mCherry under the HIV long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter.
- Cells were treated with LRAs (prostratin, iBET151, SAHA) and monitored for mCherry fluorescence over time.
- Single-cell RNA-sequencing was performed on sorted fast and slow reactivator T-lymphocytes.
Main Results:
- Microraft arrays enabled imaging of over 25,000 single cells, revealing heterogeneous reactivation kinetics.
- LRAs induced varying percentages of mCherry-expressing cells (prostratin: 30.5%, iBET151: 11.2%, SAHA: 12.1%).
- Single-cell RNA-sequencing identified distinct gene expression profiles in fast and slow reactivator subpopulations, including genes related to inflammation and immune activation.
Conclusions:
- The study highlights significant single-cell heterogeneity in HIV reactivation dynamics in response to different LRAs.
- The developed microraft array methodology allows for detailed temporal and molecular characterization of viral reactivation.
- Identifying distinct cellular responses provides insights into optimizing LRA-based HIV cure strategies.
Abstract:
A promising strategy to cure HIV-infected individuals is to use latency reversing agents (LRAs) to reactivate latent viruses, followed by host clearance of infected reservoir cells. However, reactivation of latent proviruses within infected cells is heterogeneous and often incomplete. This fact limits strategies to cure HIV which may require complete elimination of viable virus from all cellular reservoirs. For this reason, understanding the mechanism(s) of reactivation of HIV within cellular reservoirs is critical to achieve therapeutic success. Methodologies enabling temporal tracking of single cells as they reactivate followed by sorting and molecular analysis of those cells are urgently needed. To this end, microraft arrays were adapted to image T-lymphocytes expressing mCherry under the control of the HIV long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter, in response to the application of LRAs (prostratin, iBET151, and SAHA). In response to prostratin, iBET151, and SAHA, 30.5%, 11.2%, and 12.1% percentage of cells, respectively. The arrays enabled large numbers of single cells (>25,000) to be imaged over time. mCherry fluorescence quantification identified cell subpopulations with differing reactivation kinetics. Significant heterogeneity was observed at the single-cell level between different LRAs in terms of time to reactivation, rate of mCherry fluorescence increase upon reactivation, and peak fluorescence attained. In response to prostratin, subpopulations of T lymphocytes with slow and fast reactivation kinetics were identified. Single T-lymphocytes that were either fast or slow reactivators were sorted, and single-cell RNA-sequencing was performed. Different genes associated with inflammation, immune activation, and cellular and viral transcription factors were found.
More Related Videos
07:21Processing of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid and Matched Blood for Alveolar Macrophage and CD4+ T-cell Immunophenotyping and HIV Reservoir Assessment
Published on: June 23, 2019
00:09Single-cell Screening Method for the Selection and Recovery of Antibodies with Desired Specificities from Enriched Human Memory B Cell Populations
Published on: August 22, 2019