Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2025

Amplifying and Quantifying HIV-1 RNA in HIV Infected Individuals with Viral Loads Below the Limit of Detection by Standard Clinical Assays
Published on: September 26, 2011
The Perils of Overly Sensitive Viral Load Testing for Persons With Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Maria G Rodriguez1, Alina Syros1, Allan E Rodriguez1
1Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Insights
The "undetectable = untransmittable" (U = U) HIV concept is vital. Current sensitive tests create confusion below 200 copies/mL, potentially harming patients without clear benefits.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Public Health
- Infectious Diseases
Background:
- The "undetectable = untransmittable" (U = U) concept revolutionized HIV prevention and treatment.
- Historically, an HIV RNA viral load (VL) below 200 copies/mL defined undetectability for U = U studies.
- Increasingly sensitive VL assays now detect levels below 20 copies/mL, causing definitional confusion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address confusion surrounding the definition of "undetectable" viral load (VL) in HIV.
- To evaluate the clinical significance of VLs between the lower limit of detection (LLD) and 200 copies/mL.
- To propose improvements in VL reporting and patient counseling regarding HIV transmission.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing studies on U = U and viral load assays.
- Analysis of the implications of highly sensitive VL testing on HIV management.
- Discussion of clinical benefits and potential harms of reporting very low VLs.
Main Results:
- VLs between the LLD (e.g., 20 copies/mL) and 200 copies/mL are associated with future virologic failure.
- No demonstrated clinical benefit exists for intervening in patients with VLs in this range.
- Current reporting practices for low VLs may be harmful due to lack of clear benefit.
Conclusions:
- Overly sensitive VL testing can create confusion and potential harm in the context of U = U.
- Recommendations are made for adjusting VL reporting thresholds and enhancing provider counseling.
- Further research is needed to mitigate harms associated with highly sensitive VL testing and clarify U = U definitions.
Abstract:
The concept of "undetectable = untransmittable (U = U)" has been revolutionary in both the prevention and treatment of persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Most studies proving the concept of U = U used an HIV RNA (viral load [VL]) cutoff of 200 copies/mL to define being undetectable. Since then, increasingly sensitive commercial VL assays, sometimes down to a lower limit of detection (LLD) of 20 copies/mL, lead to confusion about the definition of "undetectable" and when someone is truly considered untransmittable. VLs between the LLD and 200 copies/mL have been associated with future virologic failure; however, no data exist to suggest that intervening in those patients leads to any meaningful benefits. In the absence of a demonstrable benefit of reporting such low VLs, we view this practice as harmful. We suggest recommendations for adjusting VL reporting and improving provider counseling, and call for research designs to mitigate the harms of overly sensitive VL testing.
Related Concept Videos
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...

